Skip to main content

Security report for porngrader.com

My Blog · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PornGrader.com is a niche adult media aggregator and review platform that curates and categorizes over 130 types of pornographic websites. Founded in 2017, it serves adult users seeking comprehensive porn site reviews and collections. The website operates on a WordPress CMS with a Gridlove theme and employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Fonts, Matomo Analytics, and Google Tag Manager. DNS is managed via Cloudflare, and the domain is registered with Name.com, Inc. The site offers a contact form but lacks explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages, which impacts its compliance posture. Security-wise, HTTPS is enabled, but no advanced security headers are detected, and DNSSEC is not enabled. The site extensively links to numerous external adult content domains, many of which are well-known in the industry.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching porngrader.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model centers on content aggregation and affiliate marketing by providing categorized reviews and links to adult websites. Its market position is that of a specialized adult media content curator targeting adult consumers interested in pornographic content. The platform's revenue likely derives from affiliate partnerships with linked sites. The absence of detailed company information, privacy policies, and contact emails suggests a small-scale operation focused on content rather than corporate transparency. The extensive external linking indicates a broad partnership or affiliate ecosystem, although no direct partner domains are explicitly identified. The site’s SEO and structured data implementation support discoverability and user engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are present, and no security.txt file is found. The use of third-party analytics and affiliate links introduces additional risk vectors. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with room for improvement in headers, DNSSEC, and formal security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain security.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve incident response readiness.
  5. Provide verified company contact emails and phone numbers to increase business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
My Blog
Description
PornGrader had the best collection of Porn Sites. We have over 130 Categories of Porn Sites
Key services
Porn site reviews, Categorized porn site listings, Affiliate linking to porn sites
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Fonts, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Gridlove WordPress Theme, All in One SEO Pro
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based adult content aggregator and review site.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  3. Contact is available only via a contact page with a form; no emails or phone numbers found.
  4. Uses Matomo and Google Analytics for tracking, with moderate user tracking.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  6. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. Domain is registered since 2017 with no privacy protection.
  8. Extensive external linking to many adult content domains, mostly well-known.
  9. No social media links or company emails found.
  10. Site branding is moderate; logo present with alt text 'My Blog'.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 using the Gridlove theme and All in One SEO Pro plugin, indicating a modern CMS setup. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and Google Fonts for UI/UX enhancements. Analytics are handled via Matomo and Google Tag Manager, showing a mix of open-source and commercial tracking tools. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS but the hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and JSON-LD structured data. However, the absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with porngrader.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review porngrader.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.