Skip to main content

Security report for polskabezgotowkowa.pl

Fundacja Polska Bezgotówkowa · Finance · Poland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fundacja Polska Bezgotówkowa is a Polish non-profit foundation dedicated to promoting cashless payments across Poland by providing payment terminals and educational initiatives. The foundation targets Polish businesses and merchants aiming to adopt modern payment technologies. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with a clear focus on its mission. Technically, the site is built on a modern Next.js and React stack, integrating multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility could be improved. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and standard security headers likely in place. However, the absence of explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, as well as lack of direct contact information, slightly reduce privacy compliance and business credibility scores. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the website's claims, indicating legitimacy and transparency. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and terms pages, enhancing accessibility, and providing clear contact channels for security and general inquiries.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching polskabezgotowkowa.pl

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation occupies a niche in the Polish financial sector, focusing on cashless payment adoption. Its business model revolves around non-profit activities, including distribution of payment terminals at no cost and promoting digital payment methods. The foundation leverages partnerships, notably with InPost, to enhance service delivery. Revenue streams likely include sponsorships, grants, and partnerships rather than direct sales. The target customer segment includes small to medium-sized businesses in Poland. The website's integration of multiple marketing and analytics tools indicates a mature digital marketing approach. The foundation's consistent branding and clear mission statement support strong market positioning within Poland's cashless payment ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of security headers. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the presence of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface and requires ongoing monitoring. The lack of explicit security policy and incident response contact information is a compliance gap. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced transparency and documented security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data processing and GDPR compliance.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy pages to improve legal transparency.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including security incident contacts.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet WCAG standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fundacja Polska Bezgotówkowa
Description
Dołącz do działań Fundacji Polska Bezgotówkowa, odbierz terminal płatniczy za 0 zł i rozwijaj z nami płatności bezgotówkowe w Polsce!
Key services
Provision of payment terminals, Promotion of cashless payments, Educational activities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads, Tradedoubler
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, dc.cux.io, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft UET
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Tradedoubler, Criteo, Google Ads, Bing Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Criteo Pixel, Microsoft UET
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern Next.js framework with React.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories.
  3. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts are used.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. Social media presence confirmed via Twitter handle @bezgotowkowa.
  7. Website is fully accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  8. Content is focused on promoting cashless payments in Poland via a foundation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js and React, indicating a modern and scalable architecture. It uses Cookiebot for cookie consent management and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Bing Ads. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive images and fonts. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in load times by optimizing third-party scripts. No CMS detected, suggesting a custom or headless approach. Hosting provider details are not explicit but likely a professional hosting environment given HTTPS and performance. Technical risks include dependency on multiple third-party services which require continuous security monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with polskabezgotowkowa.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review polskabezgotowkowa.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.