Skip to main content

Security report for pologne.travel

Office National Polonais de Tourisme · Hospitality · Poland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.pologne.travel/fr is an official French-language tourism portal managed by the Polish National Tourism Office. It provides comprehensive travel inspiration, regional guides, and certified tourism product recommendations to French-speaking tourists interested in visiting Poland. The site is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and features strong privacy compliance including GDPR-aligned cookie consent mechanisms. Technically, it is built on WordPress with modern tracking and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and Complianz GDPR plugin. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced, though security headers are not explicitly detected. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed response, likely indicating privacy protection, which is justified for this type of government-related site. Overall, the site is trustworthy, well-maintained, and serves as a key digital asset for Poland's tourism promotion.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pologne.travel

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The portal operates as a national tourism authority platform, targeting international tourists with localized content in multiple languages. Its business model focuses on promoting Poland's regions, cities, UNESCO sites, and national parks, leveraging certified tourism products and user recommendations. The site maintains partnerships with related official domains such as poland.travel and polska.travel, enhancing its market reach. The content quality and branding consistency position it strongly in the hospitality and government sectors. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a centralized contact form approach, typical for government portals. The platform's digital maturity is moderate to high, with ongoing content updates and marketing integrations.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR, indicating a mature privacy and security approach. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be addressed to enhance protection against common web threats. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contacts limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional hardening and public security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure HTTP security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance monitoring and auditing of third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate supply chain risks.
  5. Maintain regular WHOIS data accuracy and consider publishing registrant information consistent with transparency best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Office National Polonais de Tourisme
Description
Narodowy Portal Turystyczny to serwis w którym znajdziecie wiele inspiracji do podróży po naszym pięknym kraju. To bank pomysłów i informacji turystycznych o polskich regionach, miastach i atrakcjach. Dobra UNESCO, parki narodowe a może uzdrowiska? Polska.travel to także nasze rekomendacje – najlepsze produkty turystyczne nagrodzone Certyfikatem POT, ale także rekomendacje internautów dzięki akcji „Ambasador miejsca”.
Key services
Tourism inspiration and information, Regional and city guides, UNESCO sites and national parks info, Travel preparation advice, Certified tourism product recommendations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Complianz GDPR plugin, Instagram Feed plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR plugin
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a multilingual official tourism portal for Poland.
  2. Content is rich, professionally presented, and well structured.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie compliance with opt-in consent.
  4. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, likely privacy protected.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. Multiple external links to official and partner tourism domains.
  8. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact via form only.
Technical notes

Notes

The site is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with jQuery 3.7.1 and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. It employs the Complianz GDPR plugin for cookie consent management and an Instagram Feed plugin for social media integration. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as font size adjustment and contrast toggling. Performance is moderate, with some caching and optimization via Autoptimize plugin. The technical stack is modern and well-supported, though hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data for rich snippets.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pologne.travel. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pologne.travel.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.