Skip to main content

Security report for pollster.pl

Accorp Sp. z o.o. · Media · Poland

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Instytut Badań Pollster, operated by Accorp Sp. z o.o., is a well-established Polish market research institute founded in 2012. It specializes in comprehensive market and opinion research services, including CAWI, CAPI, CATI, and qualitative studies. The company holds a strong market position, ranking second in Poland for CAWI interviews in 2022, and targets businesses and institutions seeking data-driven insights to support growth. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to its audience. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Google reCAPTCHA, Hotjar, and Google Analytics, with a CMS identified as Bolt. Hosting and domain registration are managed by home.pl S.A. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices. Privacy compliance is robust, featuring a consent management platform and detailed privacy and cookie policies, ensuring GDPR adherence. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms, and integrates a consent management platform. However, it lacks explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response contact. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The domain registration is consistent with the business claims, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong compliance and professional business representation. Strategic improvements in security headers and incident response transparency could further enhance its security posture and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pollster.pl

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pollster operates in the media sector, focusing on market research services with a proprietary research panel and technology. Its competitive advantage lies in its high volume of CAWI interviews and a comprehensive service offering including qualitative research and recruitment. The business model is service-oriented, targeting corporate and institutional clients. The company benefits from partnerships within the ZPR Media group ecosystem, enhancing its data protection and privacy capabilities. Growth indicators include a strong market position and client satisfaction claims. The company maintains a medium size with a clear legal identity and transparent contact information.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms, and a consent management platform ensuring GDPR compliance. The presence of a named Data Protection Officer with contact details further strengthens data protection governance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposures were identified, indicating good operational security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to prevent vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Accorp Sp. z o.o.
Registration number
KRS: 0000322777
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Accorp Sp. z o.o.
Description
Instytut Badań Pollster offers comprehensive market and opinion research including CAWI, CAPI, CATI, and qualitative studies to support business growth.
Key services
CAWI research, CAPI research, CATI research, Qualitative research, Recruitment for studies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Google reCAPTCHA, Hotjar, Google Analytics (gtag.js), CMP consent management (smart.idmnet.pl)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Consent management platform for GDPR compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
CMP consent widget
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong GDPR compliance with CMP and detailed privacy policy.
  3. Contact form uses Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection.
  4. Clear business identity with legal company data and DPO contact.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  6. No DNSSEC enabled on domain, which is a minor security gap.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, FontAwesome for icons, and Google services for analytics and spam protection. The CMS used is Bolt, which is a lightweight and flexible platform. Hosting is managed by home.pl S.A., a reputable Polish provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses a consent management platform to handle GDPR compliance effectively. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by adding security headers and improving accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pollster.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pollster.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.