Skip to main content

Security report for poliankovo.sk

Spoločnosť TAKATA s.r.o. · Hospitality · Slovakia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Poliankovo is a small hospitality and digital art business located in the High Tatras, Slovakia, operated by Spoločnosť TAKATA s.r.o. The company offers a unique combination of a digital gallery featuring modern technologies such as virtual reality and augmented reality, alongside a cafe serving Italian coffee and a gallery shop with souvenirs. The website is built on WordPress with Elementor and integrates modern web technologies, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit privacy and security policies. No contact emails or phone numbers are provided, only a physical address in the footer. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security headers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching poliankovo.sk

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets tourists and families visiting the High Tatras region, leveraging interactive digital art to differentiate itself in the hospitality sector. Its business model combines exhibition, retail, and cafe services, creating multiple revenue streams. The company maintains a consistent brand presence online and uses analytics for user tracking. The absence of detailed privacy and security policies suggests an opportunity to enhance compliance and customer trust. The company appears to be well-positioned locally but could benefit from expanding digital engagement and transparency.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, indicating awareness of basic security and privacy requirements. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of incident response or security policy pages highlight gaps in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from implementing additional security best practices and publishing clear security and privacy documentation to improve compliance and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service page.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by adding an incident response or security contact page.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Spoločnosť TAKATA s.r.o.
Registration number
IČO: 48 151 271
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Spoločnosť TAKATA s.r.o.
Description
Poliankovo is a digital gallery and cafe located in the High Tatras, Slovakia. It combines art with modern technologies such as virtual reality, 3D projections, augmented reality, holograms, and interactive installations. The venue also features a cafe serving Italian coffee and a gallery shop with souvenirs and prints.
Key services
Digital art gallery with interactive technologies, Cafe serving Italian coffee and specialty drinks, Gallery shop with souvenirs and prints, Photo printing services via app
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.2.6, Elementor 3.12.2, Elementor Pro 3.12.3, jQuery 3.6.4, Google Analytics, MediaElement.js, Swiper.js
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based digital gallery and cafe site with good content and design.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented but no explicit privacy or terms of service pages found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the page; only physical address in footer.
  4. No security policy or incident response information available.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and plugins indicates active maintenance.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and integrates several JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Swiper, and MediaElement.js for multimedia content. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for tracking. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed by optimizing scripts and images. The technical stack is standard for small to medium hospitality businesses, with opportunities to improve security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with poliankovo.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review poliankovo.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.