Skip to main content

Security report for platformaprotiulozisti.cz

Platforma proti hlubinnému úložišti · Energy · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Platforma proti hlubinnému úložišti is a Czech non-profit advocacy platform representing municipalities and civic groups opposing the construction of a deep geological repository for radioactive waste. The website serves as an information hub and coordination point for affected communities, providing news updates and articulating their position on nuclear waste management policies. The platform currently represents 58 members, including 40 municipalities and 18 associations, focusing on influencing government decisions and raising public awareness. Technically, the website employs standard web technologies including jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is accessible over HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers and comprehensive privacy or cookie policies, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security posture. The site design is functional with clear navigation, though mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. From a security perspective, the site shows moderate maturity with HTTPS enabled but missing key security headers and privacy compliance elements. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain reduces trustworthiness and complicates domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is safe and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures. Strategically, the platform should prioritize implementing GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies, improve security headers, and enhance mobile and accessibility features to strengthen user trust and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching platformaprotiulozisti.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform occupies a niche advocacy role within the Czech energy and environmental sector, representing local governments and civic organizations concerned about nuclear waste repository siting. Its business model is non-profit and community-focused, relying on member participation and public engagement rather than commercial revenue streams. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its collective representation of multiple municipalities and associations, providing a unified voice in policy debates. Growth indicators include recent membership increases and active news updates. Partnerships appear limited to civic and local government entities. The platform's operations are transparent and mission-driven, with a clear focus on influencing government policy and protecting local interests.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options weakens protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No evidence of vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data was found. The site lacks explicit incident response or security contact information, and no vulnerability disclosure or security policies are published. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible cookie consent mechanisms or privacy policies, posing GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security culture appears nascent, with opportunities for significant improvement in policy transparency and technical defenses.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance web security.
  3. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to broaden user reach and compliance.
  4. Publish clear security and incident response policies including dedicated contact channels.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Platforma proti hlubinnému úložišti
Description
Platforma proti hlubinnému úložišti is a voluntary, non-profit association of municipalities and associations affected by the project of building a deep geological repository for radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel. It currently represents the interests of 58 members - 40 towns and municipalities and 18 associations. The platform aims to change the state's approach to handling spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste, advocating for decisions on site selection to be conditioned on prior consent of affected municipalities.
Key services
Advocacy, Legal support, Public awareness, Community coordination
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, limiting domain trust verification.
  3. Site is a non-profit advocacy platform focused on nuclear waste repository opposition.
  4. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage.
  6. Uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking.
  7. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled but security posture can be improved.
  8. Content is in Czech language and targeted at local municipalities and citizens.
  9. External links include Google services and a suspiciously malformed domain 'www.nechcemeuloziste.cztest'.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional HTML structure with CSS imported for styling and jQuery for scripting. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, indicating some level of digital maturity. The site lacks modern JavaScript frameworks or CMS identification, suggesting a custom or legacy build. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or CDN usage. Accessibility features such as skip links are present but overall mobile optimization is basic. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation but could be enhanced. The hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the data. Technical debt is moderate, with opportunities to modernize the tech stack and improve security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with platformaprotiulozisti.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review platformaprotiulozisti.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.