Skip to main content

Security report for planetclue.com

planet clue · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Planet Clue is a personal creative website representing Evan Clue, a young graphic designer, video producer, and content creator focused on niche and esoteric media from the late 1990s and early 2000s. The site serves as a portfolio and social media hub, linking to various platforms such as TikTok, YouTube, Patreon, Discord, and Bluesky. The business model appears to be centered on personal branding and content monetization via Patreon and media promotion. Technically, the website is built with basic HTML and CSS, hosted likely on AWS infrastructure given the registrar and DNS servers. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No CMS or frameworks are detected, indicating a simple static site. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has a valid domain status but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. There are no forms or data collection points, reducing attack surface, but also no privacy or cookie policies, which impacts compliance. No incident response or security policies are published, and no contact information is provided, limiting transparency. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and suitable for general audiences but would benefit from improved security practices, privacy compliance, and contact transparency to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching planetclue.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
85
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Planet Clue operates as a niche personal brand in the media sector, targeting enthusiasts of retro and surreal media culture. The competitive advantage lies in its unique content focus and multi-platform social media presence. Revenue streams likely include Patreon support and content creation services. The target customer segment is young adults interested in Y2K and esoteric media. The partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms but no formal business partners or subsidiaries. Growth indicators are limited due to the site's recent creation in 2023. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding content offerings and formalizing compliance and security measures to build credibility.

Security posture

The security maturity of Planet Clue is basic. The site benefits from HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and critical security headers, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and similar regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, limiting preparedness for security events. The lack of contact information reduces transparency and trust. While no vulnerabilities or malware are detected, the site should implement security best practices to improve its posture and reduce potential risks.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  4. Add clear contact information and incident response details to increase transparency and trust.
  5. Consider adding vulnerability disclosure and security.txt files to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
planet clue
Description
Personal homepage of Evan Clue, a twenty-something graphic designer, video producer, and content creator who celebrates niche, esoteric, and surreal media from the late '90s and early 2000s (Y2K).
Key services
Graphic design, Video production, Content creation, Media portfolio showcase
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain uses HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Domain status is 'ok' with no warnings

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal homepage for a creative individual.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers provided.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms present.
  5. Social media presence is strong with multiple platforms linked.
  6. No security policies or incident response information available.
  7. No advertising or tracking technologies detected.
  8. Website content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  9. Technical implementation is basic but functional.
  10. Security posture is average with room for improvement.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is a simple static site built with HTML and CSS, hosted on infrastructure associated with Amazon Registrar, Inc. The site loads moderate content including images and GIFs, with basic mobile optimization. No CMS or JavaScript frameworks are detected, indicating low technical complexity. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Performance is moderate, with no advanced optimization techniques observed. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and security headers, which could expose the site to DNS attacks and clickjacking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with planetclue.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review planetclue.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.