Skip to main content

Security report for pkg.lt

VšĮ „Psichologinio konsultavimo grupė“ · Healthcare · Lithuania

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website pkg.lt represents VšĮ „Psichologinio konsultavimo grupė“, a Lithuanian non-profit organization specializing in psychological counseling, training, mentorship, and research. The organization targets individuals and professionals seeking mental health support and educational resources within Lithuania. The site offers a variety of services including consultations, methodological tools, and educational articles, positioning itself as an accredited and trusted local entity with multiple social and professional partnerships. Technically, the website employs AngularJS framework, Bootstrap CSS, and integrates third-party analytics and tracking tools such as Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and content quality, although accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. No CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly identified. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. No WHOIS data was retrievable due to query limits, but the domain appears legitimate based on content and trust signals. The security posture is moderate with recommendations to enhance header implementation, privacy disclosures, and vulnerability disclosures. Overall, the website is professionally presented with strong business credibility but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices to reduce risk and enhance user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pkg.lt

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a small-sized non-profit in the healthcare and education sectors, focusing on psychological counseling and training services. Its business model revolves around providing educational materials, consultations, and mentorship programs, supported by partnerships with accredited educational and social institutions. The presence of multiple partner logos and accreditation badges indicates a well-established local reputation. Revenue streams likely include training fees, sales of methodological tools, and possibly grants or public funding. The target market is primarily Lithuanian individuals and professionals interested in mental health and education. The organization has maintained consistent branding and content quality since its founding in 2008, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The site uses HTTPS, which is mandatory, but lacks implementation of key security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. There is no evidence of an incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanism. The use of third-party tracking tools increases the need for transparent privacy practices. Overall, the security culture appears basic and would benefit from formalized policies and technical enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible on the website.
  2. Add and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks.
  5. Improve accessibility compliance to meet WCAG standards and enhance user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
VšĮ „Psichologinio konsultavimo grupė“
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VšĮ „Psichologinio konsultavimo grupė“
Description
An organization providing psychological counseling services, training, mentorship, research, and methodological tools primarily in Lithuania.
Key services
Psychological consultations, Training (Mokymai), Methodological tools (Priemonės), Mentorship (Mentorystė), Research (Tyrimai), Articles (Straipsniai)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AngularJS (ng directives), jQuery (implied by bootstrap classes), Bootstrap CSS, Owl Carousel, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
AngularJS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL (https://pkg.lt/)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Lithuanian language.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on the main page.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded; no registrar or domain dates extracted.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in footer with emails, phone numbers, and physical address.
  5. Use of modern web technologies including AngularJS and tracking tools like Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager.
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML content; security posture could be improved.
  7. Business is a Lithuanian non-profit focused on psychological counseling and education.
  8. Multiple partner and accreditation logos present indicating trust and legitimacy.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking; no error pages detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using AngularJS, Bootstrap, and integrates common analytics and marketing tools such as Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager. The design is responsive and content-rich, with good navigation and user experience. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization. No CMS or hosting provider details were identified, suggesting a custom or self-managed infrastructure. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features, which could be improved. Security headers are missing, representing technical debt and risk. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pkg.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pkg.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.