Skip to main content

Security report for pizzeriacapero.net

Pizzeria Capero · Hospitality · Finland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pizzeria Capero is a well-established local restaurant in Savonlinna, Finland, operating since 1983. The business offers a variety of food services including pizzas, pastas, salads, desserts, and drinks, targeting local residents and visitors. The website reflects a small hospitality business with a clear focus on local clientele and traditional offerings. The market position is strong locally, supported by a long history and consistent branding. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Kadence theme and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and SEO-aware infrastructure. Hosting is provided by a Finnish hosting provider, and the site is mobile-optimized with good performance and accessibility basics. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site shows a moderate security posture with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and cookie consent, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. The domain registration is consistent and trustworthy, with a long registration history and no privacy protection, aligning with the business's local and transparent nature. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and functional, but could improve privacy compliance and security best practices to enhance user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pizzeriacapero.net

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pizzeria Capero operates in the hospitality sector as a local restaurant with a strong community presence in Savonlinna. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing history since 1983 and diversified menu offerings. The business model is traditional dine-in and takeaway food services. Revenue streams likely come from food sales and beverages. The target customer segment includes local residents and tourists seeking quality pizza and related dishes. The company maintains a simple partnership ecosystem, primarily with local suppliers and hosting providers. Growth indicators include a maintained online presence and social media engagement. Strategic observations suggest focusing on digital marketing and enhancing privacy/security compliance to support future growth.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. There is no published incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. GDPR compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. The absence of security contact channels reduces transparency. Overall, the security culture appears basic, suitable for a small business but with room for improvement to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and provide security contact information on the website.
  4. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  5. Regularly audit and update plugins and themes to avoid vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pizzeria Capero
Description
Savonlinnan keskustassa jo vuodesta 1983 toiminut Pizzeria Capero kuuluu paikkakunnan suosituimpiin ruokapaikkoihin. Vuosien varrella pizzojen lisäksi on listalle tullut mukaan maukkaita ruukkuruokia, pastoja ja kevyempää ruokaa edustavia salaattiannoksia.
Key services
Pizzas, Pastas, Salads, Other foods, Desserts, Drinks
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Kadence Theme, Kadence Blocks plugin, Google Fonts (Poppins, Roboto Slab)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Kadence theme and Yoast SEO plugin.
  2. Content is in Finnish language targeting local customers.
  3. No forms detected on the homepage; contact is via phone and physical address.
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found.
  5. Social media presence limited to Facebook.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  7. No incident response or security contact information published.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  9. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificate.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with the Kadence theme and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating good SEO and content management capabilities. Hosting is via a Finnish provider with domain nameservers pointing to hurjahosting.fi. The site loads moderate performance assets, uses Google Fonts, and is mobile responsive. There is no evidence of heavy analytics or tracking scripts, which benefits privacy. The site lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, representing technical debt in security and compliance. Overall, the infrastructure is stable but could benefit from security hardening and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pizzeriacapero.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pizzeriacapero.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.