Skip to main content

Security report for pitsandpubes.com

Pits And Pubes · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PitsAndPubes.com is a niche adult entertainment website specializing in videos and photos featuring men with hairy armpits and pubic hair. The site operates on a subscription-based business model, offering exclusive adult content to members. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, targeting adult audiences interested in this specific fetish. The domain is well-established since 2014, supporting the site's credibility and market presence. Technically, the site uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap 4, Font Awesome, and Google Analytics. It is hosted with a reputable registrar and uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure data transmission. Mobile optimization and user experience are good, though accessibility features are basic. SEO practices are present but could be enhanced. From a security perspective, the site has a moderate posture. HTTPS is enforced, and domain transfer protection is enabled. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML content. There is no public security or incident response policy, and no direct contact emails or phone numbers are provided. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie policy banner despite cookie usage. Overall, the site is functional and credible within its niche but would benefit from improved security headers, enhanced privacy compliance, and clearer contact information to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pitsandpubes.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche segment in the adult entertainment industry, focusing on a specific fetish which differentiates it from mainstream adult sites. Its subscription-based model suggests recurring revenue streams. The presence of authorized billing partners and affiliate programs indicates a structured monetization and partnership ecosystem. The site targets adult consumers interested in fetish content, leveraging specialized content to maintain market position. Growth indicators include active content updates and social media presence. Strategic observations include the need to enhance compliance and security transparency to maintain competitive advantage and customer trust.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protection, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options exposes the site to potential risks such as DNS spoofing and clickjacking. No incident response or security contact information is publicly available, which limits the ability to report or respond to security incidents effectively. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie policy banner despite tracking scripts. The site should prioritize implementing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security policies to improve its security posture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing attacks.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a clear cookie policy and implement a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and customer support to improve trust and incident response.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pits And Pubes
Description
Pits and Pubes is an adult entertainment website focused on videos and photos featuring men with hairy armpits and pubic hair. The site offers adult videos and photos for members and promotes signups for access.
Key services
Adult videos, Adult photos, Membership access
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4, Font Awesome, Google Analytics, Swiper.js, Fancybox
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Adult content site with clear age gate
  2. Uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  3. Includes standard adult site compliance statements
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found
  5. Uses common web technologies and analytics
  6. No advanced security headers detected
  7. No privacy or cookie policy banner found despite cookie usage
  8. Affiliate and billing partners clearly listed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap 4, Font Awesome, and Swiper.js for UI components and interactivity. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and tracking. The site is hosted with a registrar known for domain services but does not use DNSSEC, which is a technical gap. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts and responsive design for mobile devices. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but maintains basic usability standards. There is an opportunity to modernize the tech stack by reducing reliance on older libraries like jQuery and enhancing SEO and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pitsandpubes.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pitsandpubes.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.