Skip to main content

Security report for pinupdollars.com

PFC Media Inc. · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pinup Dollars operates as an adult affiliate marketing platform specializing in promoting busty glamour model websites within the PinupFiles Network. The business model centers on revenue sharing and webmaster referral commissions, targeting adult affiliates and webmasters. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and provides a variety of marketing tools to support affiliates. Technically, the site uses a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap and jQuery, hosted on MojoHost, with SSL enabled and basic mobile optimization. However, some legacy technologies like the older Google Analytics script are still in use. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS and obfuscated emails but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is limited, with no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the domain registration data supports legitimacy with consistent WHOIS information and a domain age appropriate for the business claims.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pinupdollars.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company, PFC Media Inc., has established a niche position in the adult affiliate marketing sector since 2009. It leverages exclusive content from well-known adult glamour models and maintains a network of partner sites. Revenue streams include 50% revshare on memberships and 5% lifetime commissions on referred affiliates. The target audience is adult webmasters and affiliates seeking monetization opportunities in adult entertainment. The company maintains direct contact channels and provides marketing assets to affiliates, supporting growth and retention. The partnership ecosystem includes multiple official model sites, enhancing brand reach and affiliate appeal.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and obfuscated email addresses to reduce spam. However, it lacks implementation of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS, and DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to certain attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy is publicly available, and privacy compliance is minimal, lacking cookie consent mechanisms. The login form uses POST method, which is standard, but no advanced protections like CAPTCHA or multi-factor authentication are evident. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are apparent, improvements in security best practices and compliance are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect domain integrity and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance browser security.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  4. Upgrade analytics to use modern scripts (e.g., gtag.js) and review data collection practices for privacy.
  5. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PFC Media Inc.
Description
PinupDollars is an affiliate program for the PinupFiles Network of adult glamour websites featuring busty models. It offers 50% revenue share on sales and recurring memberships, plus 5% lifetime commissions on referred affiliates. The network includes multiple official model sites and has been online for over 11 years.
Key services
Affiliate program, Marketing tools (banners, ads, galleries, downloadable content), Revenue sharing, Webmaster referral program
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Google Analytics (ga.js)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Obfuscated email addresses via JavaScript
  • Login form uses POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (ga.js)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Banners, Full-Page Ads, Half-Page Ads, Picture of the Day, Hosted Photo Galleries, Downloadable Photos, Video of the Day, Hosted Video Galleries, Downloadable Videos
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult affiliate marketing platform with a clear business model.
  2. Content is professionally presented with consistent branding.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy detected, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No security headers detected, improvement needed.
  5. Email addresses are obfuscated to reduce spam.
  6. No phone numbers or physical addresses found.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  8. No GDPR compliance indicators beyond privacy policy presence.
  9. Uses legacy Google Analytics script (ga.js).
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS or framework with front-end technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, Owl Carousel, and Magnific Popup. Hosting is provided by MojoHost, indicated by nameservers. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and content structure. Performance is moderate, with legacy Google Analytics scripts and no advanced SEO or accessibility features detected. No CMS like WordPress or Drupal is identified, suggesting a custom-built platform. Technical debt is moderate due to legacy analytics and missing security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize analytics, improve accessibility, and enhance security configurations to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pinupdollars.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pinupdollars.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.