Skip to main content

Security report for pinkgreencreative.co.uk

Pink Green · Finance · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pink Green is an independent brand activation agency specializing in fintech clients globally. Their services focus on brand, digital, and campaign activation, positioning themselves as a niche player in the financial marketing sector. The website demonstrates a professional and modern digital presence with multimedia case studies and client testimonials, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including GSAP, Bootstrap, and Google Analytics, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though the absence of security headers and privacy policy pages suggests room for improvement. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, with a moderate risk profile primarily due to incomplete privacy compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pinkgreencreative.co.uk

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
90
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pink Green targets fintech companies requiring brand activation and digital campaign services. Their business model revolves around creative agency services with a focus on generating revenue, relationships, and recognition for clients. The presence of multiple video case studies and client testimonials indicates a strong portfolio and client satisfaction. The agency operates primarily in the UK market with offices in Reading and London. Their marketing ecosystem includes analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Lead Forensics, supporting data-driven decision-making. The lack of detailed company registration or VAT information suggests a small to medium-sized enterprise with a focus on service delivery rather than large-scale corporate disclosures.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA on forms, enhancing security against automated abuse. Cookie consent is implemented with customization options, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The lack of a published privacy policy and incident response contact reduces transparency and compliance maturity. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by adding security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and implementing a vulnerability disclosure mechanism.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Create and publish terms of service and incident response contact information to improve transparency and compliance.
  4. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security posture.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pink Green
Description
The brand, digital and campaign activation agency for global fintech clients.
Key services
Brand activation, Digital campaigns, Brand strategy
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 7.0, jQuery 3.4.1, GSAP 3.12.5, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, CookieYes Consent, Contact Form 7, Selectric, Owl Carousel, Headroom.js, ScrollReveal
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with customization
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Lead Forensics, Demandbase
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Lead Forensics, Demandbase
Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich multimedia content
  2. Strong focus on fintech brand activation
  3. Multiple video case studies demonstrating client work
  4. Cookie consent mechanism implemented with customization options
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  6. Contact information clearly presented in footer
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  8. No security headers detected in HTML source
  9. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  10. WHOIS data is privacy protected or unavailable
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 7.0 with a modern front-end stack including jQuery, GSAP for animations, Bootstrap for responsive design, and various plugins for forms and cookie consent. The site uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, along with Lead Forensics and Demandbase for visitor intelligence. Performance is moderate with optimized video content and responsive design ensuring excellent mobile experience. Accessibility features are present but could be enhanced with ARIA landmarks and semantic HTML improvements. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained with opportunities for security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pinkgreencreative.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pinkgreencreative.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.