Skip to main content

Security report for pincamp.fr

PiNCAMP GmbH · Hospitality · France

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PiNCAMP GmbH operates a leading European online platform dedicated to camping search and booking, offering access to over 14,400 campings across 44 countries. Affiliated with ADAC, the platform emphasizes quality and trust through ADAC-controlled campings and extensive user reviews. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides a rich user experience tailored to campers and travelers in Europe. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies including React and Next.js, ensuring fast performance and good SEO. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers implemented, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly available. Privacy compliance is evident with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Overall, PiNCAMP presents a credible and professional service with room for improvement in transparency of security and contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pincamp.fr

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pincamp.fr, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pincamp.fr right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PiNCAMP holds a strong market position as a specialized camping booking platform in Europe, leveraging its affiliation with ADAC to build trust and authority. Its business model focuses on providing comprehensive camping listings, user reviews, and booking capabilities, targeting families and outdoor enthusiasts. The platform's multilingual presence across multiple European countries indicates a broad partnership ecosystem and strategic market segmentation. Revenue streams likely include booking commissions and advertising. The company maintains a consistent brand image and high-quality content, supporting growth and customer retention. Strategic partnerships with regional camping sites and travel organizations further enhance its market reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers, and secure form implementations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy, incident response page, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism indicates gaps in transparency and readiness for security incidents. No direct security contact emails were found, which could hinder timely incident reporting. Compliance with GDPR is supported by a detailed privacy policy and cookie consent. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance and communication channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and user trust.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide direct security contact information such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  4. Enhance business contact information by including verified company phone numbers and physical addresses if applicable.
  5. Regularly review WHOIS data and domain registration details to ensure consistency and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PiNCAMP GmbH
Description
PiNCAMP is a camping search and booking platform offering access to over 14,400 campings across 44 European countries, with campings controlled by ADAC.
Key services
Camping search, Camping booking, Camping reviews, Camping thematic and destination guides
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, CSS, WebP images, Lazy loading, Responsive design
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Secure forms with proper labels and ARIA attributes

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong branding and consistent user experience in French language.
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via web form only.
  4. No explicit security or incident response pages found.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  6. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack including React and Next.js, enabling server-side rendering and optimized performance. It uses responsive design techniques and lazy loading for images, contributing to fast load times and excellent mobile optimization. SEO best practices are followed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features such as ARIA labels and keyboard navigation support are implemented. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless approach. Hosting provider details were not identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust, supporting a high-quality user experience with minimal technical debt.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pincamp.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pincamp.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.