Skip to main content

Security report for pimpbunny.com

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PimpBunny is an adult content website specializing in aggregating and distributing leaked OnlyFans videos and photos. The site operates on a subscription model offering premium access to high-quality, ad-free content, with payments accepted in various cryptocurrencies. The business targets users interested in accessing unauthorized leaked content from popular adult models, positioning itself as a niche player in the adult media sector. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Cloudflare DNS, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, and various JavaScript libraries for UI enhancements. However, it lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms, which diminishes its trustworthiness and exposes it to potential security risks. The absence of privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and contact information further weakens its compliance posture. Overall, the site is functional and moderately optimized for mobile and SEO but falls short in security and privacy best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pimpbunny.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pimpbunny.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
333
Employees
0
Customers
333
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
11%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for pimpbunny.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website's market positioning is focused on a controversial niche of leaked adult content, monetized through subscriptions and affiliate marketing. Its competitive advantage lies in aggregating fresh OnlyFans leaks and offering a premium experience with 4K videos and no ads. Revenue streams include subscription fees and affiliate commissions from linked adult services. The target customer segment is adult content consumers seeking unauthorized access to OnlyFans content. The partnership ecosystem includes multiple adult content and affiliate sites, enhancing its reach and monetization potential. Strategic observations highlight the need for improved compliance and security to sustain operations and reduce legal risks.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low to moderate. Key vulnerabilities include the lack of security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), absence of privacy and cookie policies, and no visible incident response or abuse contact channels. The use of HTTPS is implied but SSL configuration details are unknown. The site relies on third-party scripts and ad networks, which may introduce additional risks. Compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations are evident due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Incident response readiness is minimal, with no dedicated security contact information. The security culture appears weak, with no certifications or frameworks indicated.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear contact information for security incidents, abuse reporting, and general inquiries to improve trust and incident response.
  4. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
PimpBunny provides access to leaked OnlyFans content, offering users the freshest leaked videos and photos of popular models.
Key services
Access to leaked OnlyFans videos and photos, Premium subscription for ad-free 4K content, Search and browse videos, models, and categories
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare DNS, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, jQuery (implied by fancybox usage), Fancybox, Ion.RangeSlider, Owl Carousel, Custom CSS and JS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
tsyndicate.com, wpadmngr.com, capndr.com, cdn-fc.com
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website provides adult content leaked from OnlyFans models, which raises legal and ethical concerns.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating poor compliance posture.
  3. No contact or security incident response information available, reducing trustworthiness.
  4. Multiple external links to adult and affiliate sites, indicating monetization via affiliate marketing and ads.
  5. Use of Cloudflare DNS but no DNSSEC enabled.
  6. Google Tag Manager used for analytics and tracking.
  7. Subscription model with cryptocurrency payment options.
  8. No visible security headers or advanced security measures detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure leverages Cloudflare DNS and a mix of modern front-end technologies including Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Fancybox, Ion.RangeSlider, and Owl Carousel. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, the absence of a CMS or framework identification suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external ad and affiliate scripts that may impact load times. Technical debt is indicated by missing security best practices and incomplete privacy compliance. Modernization opportunities include adopting a recognized CMS or framework with built-in security and compliance features, and optimizing third-party script usage.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pimpbunny.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pimpbunny.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.