Skip to main content

Security report for pilsetaspasaza.lv

SIA "Marno J" · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pilsētas Pasāža is a retail shopping center located strategically in the city center of Jelgava, Latvia. It offers a variety of approximately 40 stores, a large retail area of 22,500 square meters, and convenient access including underground parking. The website serves as an information portal for visitors and customers, providing details about stores, promotions, news, and contact information. The business targets local residents and visitors, positioning itself as a key retail hub in the region. The company behind the site is SIA "Marno J". Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern themes and plugins such as Blocksy and Greenshift Animation Blocks. It is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and a moderate performance profile. The site uses HTTPS and includes social media integration but lacks some advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site has a good baseline with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and cookie consent, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-suited for its business purpose. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security headers would enhance its security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pilsetaspasaza.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a medium-sized retail shopping center serving Jelgava and surrounding areas. Its competitive advantage lies in its central location, diverse store offerings, and active promotion of sales and events. The business model focuses on attracting foot traffic to physical stores through online information dissemination and marketing. Revenue streams likely include rental income from tenants and possibly event hosting. The target customers are local shoppers and visitors. The company maintains active social media channels to engage customers. Growth indicators include frequent promotions and a well-maintained website. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a cookie consent mechanism indicate gaps in security best practices and privacy compliance. No incident response or security policy information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness. The site does not appear to use vulnerable libraries or expose forms with obvious security issues. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a retail informational site but could be improved to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "Marno J"
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Marno J"
Description
Tirdzniecības centrs “Pilsētas Pasāža” atrodas Jelgavas pilsētas centrā, piedāvājot 40 dažādu preču klāsta veikalus, pazemes autostāvvietu un ērtu piekļuvi gan vietējiem iedzīvotājiem, gan viesiem no citām pilsētām un valstīm.
Key services
Tirdzniecības centra veikalu informācija, Akciju un piedāvājumu publicēšana, Apmeklētāju informācija un kontakti
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, Greenshift Animation and Page Builder Blocks, Kadence Blocks, Blocksy Theme, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to a retail shopping center.
  3. Clear contact information and social media presence enhance trust.
  4. Privacy policy and terms of service pages are present and accessible.
  5. No security policy or incident response information found.
  6. No cookie consent mechanism detected, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain registration trust analysis.
  8. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  9. Website uses modern WordPress-based technology stack with popular plugins and themes.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern theme (Blocksy) and uses several plugins for layout and animation (Greenshift, Kadence Blocks). It loads Google Fonts and uses lazy loading for images to optimize performance. The site is mobile responsive and structured with semantic HTML. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pilsetaspasaza.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pilsetaspasaza.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.