Skip to main content

Security report for piladzis.lv

Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website piladzis.lv represents a regional sports and recreation park named “Pīlādži” located in Latvia, offering motocross tracks, camping, and event hosting services with capacity for up to 25,000 visitors. The business targets motorsport enthusiasts, event organizers, and tourists, providing infrastructure such as sports fields, parking, stages, and amenities. The site is built on DIRcms and uses a variety of JavaScript libraries for UI and media presentation, including jQuery, bxSlider, Owl Carousel, and Google Maps API. The technical infrastructure is moderately modern with good mobile optimization but basic SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is average with no HTTPS or security headers information available from the data, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and terms pages, though a cookie consent banner is present. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust analysis. Overall, the site is functional, professional, and safe for general audiences but would benefit from improved security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching piladzis.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Piladzis.lv operates in the hospitality and sports event sector, focusing on motocross and large-scale outdoor events. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive 25-hectare venue with comprehensive infrastructure supporting up to 25,000 attendees. Revenue streams likely include event hosting fees, camping accommodations, and on-site catering/trade services. The target market includes regional motorsport fans, cultural event attendees, and tourists. The website shows moderate branding consistency and a partnership with DIRcms for content management. Growth indicators are not explicit but the presence of an archive of past events suggests ongoing activity. The Facebook page indicates some social media engagement. Strategic partnerships appear limited to the CMS provider. The business model is straightforward, focusing on venue rental and associated services.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic to moderate. The website does not expose sensitive information and uses common JavaScript libraries without known vulnerabilities in the provided data. However, the absence of visible security headers and unknown SSL configuration are concerns. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited formal security governance. GDPR compliance is weak due to missing privacy policies, though cookie consent is implemented. The site lacks vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Enforce HTTPS site-wide and verify SSL certificate configuration to secure data in transit.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response contact or security policy to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly update third-party libraries and monitor for vulnerabilities to maintain a secure technology stack.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Sporta un atpūtas parks „Pīlādži” is a 25-hectare venue located 60 km from Riga and 20 km from the Lithuanian border, offering facilities for motocross, sports, and cultural events with capacity up to 25,000 visitors. The site includes parks, greenery, a 9-hectare forest with walking paths, a pond with swimming areas, parking for 1000 cars, sports fields (volleyball, basketball, football), motorcycle washing station, fixed catering and trade points, fencing, access roads, two large stages, drinking water hydrants, electricity connections, night lighting over 10 hectares, and Wi-Fi access.
Key services
Motocross track and events, Camping and accommodation, Sports and cultural event hosting, Catering and trade facilities
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, bxSlider, Owl Carousel, Fancybox, PhotoSwipe, Superfish, Semantic UI, WOW.js, Google Maps API
Frameworks
DIRcms
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  5. Contact information is clearly displayed with phone, email, and physical address.
  6. No security policies or incident response contacts found.
  7. No certifications or compliance badges displayed.
  8. Website uses multiple third-party JS libraries and Google Maps API.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  10. Content is relevant and professionally presented for a sports and event venue.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a CMS platform (DIRcms) with a front-end tech stack comprising jQuery and multiple UI/UX libraries such as bxSlider, Owl Carousel, Fancybox, and PhotoSwipe for media display and interaction. Semantic UI is used for styling and UI components. Google Maps API integration provides location services. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a professional design with clear navigation. However, SEO and accessibility features are basic, and no advanced performance optimizations or analytics tools are detected. Hosting provider details are not available. The site could benefit from improved technical SEO, accessibility compliance, and performance tuning to enhance user experience and search visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with piladzis.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review piladzis.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.