Skip to main content

Security report for kaleji.piejuras.lv

PieJūras.LV · Hospitality · Latvia

Partial score · DNS & email only

34/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PieJūras.LV is a regional online platform specializing in seaside accommodation and leisure services primarily in Latvia and the Baltic region. The website offers a comprehensive listing of hotels, guest houses, apartments, holiday homes, and camping options, targeting tourists seeking direct owner offers and competitive pricing. The platform supports multiple languages and provides detailed filtering options to enhance user experience. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and lazy loading for images, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though the absence of security headers and explicit incident response contacts suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits limits domain trust verification, but the website content and structure indicate a legitimate hospitality business. Overall, the site is professional, user-friendly, and compliant with basic privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kaleji.piejuras.lv

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
34

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on vacation rentals and leisure activities by the sea. It has a medium-sized market presence with a founding date of 2005, indicating established operations. The platform's business model revolves around listing accommodations and related services, generating revenue likely through advertising and listing fees. The multilingual approach and partnerships with related domains like priejuros.lt and balticseaside.lv suggest a strategy to capture a broad Baltic and international audience. The extensive listings and active availability indicators demonstrate a competitive advantage in regional market coverage. However, the absence of direct contact information on the main site may impact customer trust and support responsiveness.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent, aligning with GDPR requirements. It uses common analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, which are standard but require careful privacy management. No security headers were detected in the HTML content, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy, and no incident response contacts are provided, indicating limited transparency in security management. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adding security headers, formal incident response procedures, and clearer privacy documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and a clear vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and facilitate responsible security reporting.
  3. Add explicit contact information for security incidents and general customer support to improve trust and responsiveness.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure they do not introduce vulnerabilities or privacy risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PieJūras.LV
Description
Naktsmītnes un atpūta Jūrmalā, Ventspilī, Jūrmalā, Liepājā. Viesnīcas, viesu nami un dzīvokli atpūtai pie jūras
Key services
Accommodation listings (hotels, guest houses, apartments, holiday homes, camping), Leisure and entertainment information, Advertisement posting for accommodation providers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LazySizes (lazy loading images), Google Fonts Nunito Sans
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-established regional platform for seaside accommodation in Latvia and Baltic region.
  2. Content is rich with numerous listings and leisure information.
  3. Good multilingual support with hreflang tags and alternate URLs.
  4. Cookie consent implemented inline with EU regulations.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
  7. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  8. Use of common analytics and tracking tools including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is family-friendly.
  10. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for functionality and tracking. It loads Nunito Sans font from Google Fonts and employs lazy loading for images to optimize performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and uses canonical and hreflang tags for SEO. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modern security practices and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kaleji.piejuras.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kaleji.piejuras.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.