Skip to main content

Security report for piearsta.lv

SIA Blue Bridge Technologies · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Piearsta.lv is an established Latvian healthcare portal operated by SIA Blue Bridge Technologies, providing an online platform for patients to book appointments with doctors and specialists, including options for remote consultations. The portal integrates with the SmartMedical healthcare management system, positioning itself as a convenient and accessible service for patients and healthcare providers. The website supports Latvian and English languages and emphasizes user convenience and accessibility. Technically, the site uses Apache server, JavaScript libraries including jQuery, and integrates third-party services such as Cookiebot for consent management, Google Analytics, and Facebook SDK for tracking and marketing. Security measures include a valid SSL certificate and several HTTP security headers; however, modern TLS protocols are not enabled, which is a notable gap. The site demonstrates good privacy and cookie policy compliance with GDPR considerations but lacks explicit published security and incident response policies. Overall, the portal shows a mature digital presence with room for security enhancements and improved transparency in security governance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching piearsta.lv

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Piearsta.lv operates in the healthcare sector, targeting patients and healthcare providers in Latvia. Its business model revolves around providing an online appointment booking system and telemedicine services, leveraging partnerships with SmartMedical and Blue Bridge Technologies. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its integration with healthcare management systems and offering both in-person and remote consultations. Revenue streams likely include service fees or subscriptions from healthcare providers and possibly patient fees for premium services. The portal's multilingual support and 24/7 accessibility cater to a broad user base, enhancing market reach. Strategic partnerships with SmartMedical and Blue Bridge Technologies strengthen its ecosystem and technical capabilities. The company maintains a medium-sized operation with a focus on digital healthcare innovation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with implementation of key HTTP security headers such as HSTS, CSP with nonce, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and X-Content-Type-Options. The SSL certificate is valid and issued by a trusted CA, but the absence of modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and 1.3) reduces the overall security posture. Cookie management is handled via Cookiebot, ensuring user consent compliance. No explicit security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, indicating gaps in security governance and transparency. The site shows no known vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed or POODLE. Recommendations include enabling modern TLS versions, publishing security and incident response policies, and adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security posture is good but can be improved to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols to enhance encryption security.
  2. Implement DNSSEC and CAA DNS records to improve domain security and certificate issuance control.
  3. Refine Content Security Policy to remove 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' directives where possible.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response plan on the website for transparency.
  5. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Blue Bridge Technologies
Registration number
40003932716
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an Apache server with a valid SSL certificate issued by Sectigo. The tech stack includes JavaScript with jQuery, Cookiebot for cookie consent, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Facebook SDK for analytics and marketing. The site uses nonce-based CSP for script security. Performance metrics indicate fast load times, though no detailed resource or page size data is available. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks structured data like JSON-LD. No CMS is explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical debt is minimal but the lack of modern TLS protocols and DNS security features represent modernization opportunities and risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with piearsta.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review piearsta.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.