Skip to main content

Security report for phillipsmedisize.com

Phillips Medisize · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Phillips Medisize is a well-established contract development and manufacturing organization (CDMO) specializing in pharmaceutical, medtech, and in vitro diagnostic sectors. With a global footprint across the US, Europe, and Asia, the company emphasizes personalized engineering solutions and trusted partnerships. The website reflects a mature business with comprehensive service offerings and a strong market position under the parent company Molex. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools, delivering a professional and responsive user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain protections, though some advanced security headers and policies are absent. Privacy compliance is partially addressed via cookie consent but lacks explicit privacy and terms policies. Overall, the site projects high business credibility and technical maturity, with room for improvement in security transparency and privacy documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching phillipsmedisize.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Phillips Medisize operates as a key player in the healthcare manufacturing industry, leveraging its parent company Molex's resources and Koch's infrastructure. The business model focuses on CDMO services, targeting pharmaceutical and medtech companies requiring product design, development, and manufacturing. The company maintains a diversified portfolio including non-medical sectors like automotive and defense. Growth is supported by strategic acquisitions such as Vectura Group Ltd, enhancing inhalation drug delivery capabilities. The website's detailed navigation and resource center indicate a customer-centric approach, supporting both existing clients and prospects. Social media and news updates demonstrate active market engagement and brand building.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain transfer protection, indicating a baseline security maturity. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts suggest gaps in security transparency. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability management. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a corporate site but could be enhanced by adopting additional security best practices and publicizing incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents, such as a dedicated security or abuse email address.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize user tracking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Phillips Medisize
Description
Phillips Medisize is a leading contract development and manufacturing organization (CDMO) serving pharmaceutical, medtech, and in vitro diagnostic companies. They provide solutions for product design, development, and manufacturing, engaging customers in a tailored and personalized manner across the US, Europe, and Asia.
Key services
Product design, Development, Manufacturing, Pharmaceutical services, MedTech services, In Vitro Diagnostics, Non-medical manufacturing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Getwid MegaMenu plugin, Fancybox, Google Tag Manager, CookieLaw.org consent scripts
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive and relevant to the healthcare manufacturing sector.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or main navigation.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via third-party scripts.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in the homepage HTML; contact form is available.
  6. Social media presence includes LinkedIn and YouTube with official company pages.
  7. Security best practices partially implemented; HTTPS enforced but security headers not explicitly detected.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  9. Google Tag Manager used for analytics and tracking.
  10. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with a well-structured theme and plugins including Yoast SEO and Getwid MegaMenu, supporting SEO and navigation clarity. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics, and cookie consent scripts ensure basic privacy compliance. Hosting appears to be managed by Koch Global Services, consistent with corporate ownership. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site uses modern font loading and responsive design techniques. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with phillipsmedisize.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review phillipsmedisize.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.