Skip to main content

Security report for pharmatic.fr

Pharmatic · Healthcare · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pharmatic is a specialized software publisher focused on public hospital procurement management, offering SaaS solutions to hospital buyers and pharmaceutical industrial clients. The company holds a strong market position in France with a significant client base and is part of the Ach@t Solutions group. The website is professionally designed using Drupal 8 and integrates modern web technologies and analytics tools with appropriate privacy and cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, but lacks explicit security policies and incident response information. WHOIS data is missing, which impacts domain legitimacy verification and trust. Overall, the website and business appear credible and professional, but domain registration details should be verified for full trust assurance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pharmatic.fr

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pharmatic.fr, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pharmatic.fr right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pharmatic operates in the healthcare and technology sectors, providing SaaS software solutions for managing public hospital procurement and pharmaceutical market responses. Its business model targets hospital buyers and pharmaceutical companies, leveraging a strong national presence and expanding internationally. The company benefits from being part of the Ach@t Solutions group, which includes several subsidiaries. The website reflects a mature digital presence with clear branding, content relevance, and integration of marketing and analytics tools. The lack of direct contact emails and phone numbers on the site suggests a preference for contact via forms or dedicated contact pages. Certifications like Qualiopi enhance trust. The company is positioned as a leader in its niche with a focus on digital transformation in healthcare procurement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, indicating attention to user privacy and security. However, no security headers were detected in the provided content, and there is no published security policy or incident response contact information. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file limits transparency in security practices. Third-party scripts such as Google Analytics and Facebook SDK are used, which require monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in explicit security communications and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact details on the website.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Verify and publish WHOIS domain registration details to enhance domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pharmatic
Description
Pharmatic is a software publisher specialized in the design and distribution of software for public hospital procurement management. It serves both hospital buyers and pharmaceutical industrials, with a strong presence in France and expanding internationally.
Key services
eEpicure - SaaS consultation and purchasing group management, Eurydice Web - SaaS offer management for public hospital markets, HeliosWeb - Online tool for dematerialized public market responses
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 8, Bootstrap 3.4.1, jQuery 3.5.1, FontAwesome 4.7 and 5.0.1, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Twitter Widgets
Frameworks
Drupal CMS, Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Facebook SDK, Twitter Widgets
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and targeted to healthcare procurement software.
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Drupal 8).
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content provided.
  7. Multiple subsidiary and partner domains linked, indicating a group structure.
  8. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used with cookie consent.
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 8 CMS with Bootstrap 3.4.1 and jQuery 3.5.1, indicating a modern but slightly dated technology stack. It uses FontAwesome icons and integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, and Twitter widgets for marketing and analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors or broken elements detected. The use of CDN-hosted libraries and fonts improves load times. However, the absence of detected security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pharmatic.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pharmatic.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.