Skip to main content

Security report for phactmi.org

phactMI · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

phactMI is a non-profit collaboration of pharmaceutical industry Medical Information leaders dedicated to providing healthcare professionals with accurate, evidence-based drug information to support clinical decision making. The organization offers a searchable drug information database, scientific responses to healthcare professional inquiries, and access to clinical experts within member companies. Their market position is that of a trusted source in the pharmaceutical and healthcare information sector, primarily targeting licensed healthcare professionals in the United States and Puerto Rico. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including React, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and various marketing and tracking tools. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and content relevance. Performance is moderate, and SEO practices are adequately implemented. The site uses HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and a dedicated security policy page. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA for form protection. However, it could improve by implementing comprehensive security headers and publishing incident response contacts. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is basic but present, with clear privacy and cookie policies. Overall, phactMI presents a professional, trustworthy, and secure online presence appropriate for its healthcare-focused mission. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and improving transparency around incident response to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching phactmi.org

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

phactMI operates as a non-profit entity within the healthcare sector, focusing on pharmaceutical medical information services. Its business model revolves around collaboration among pharmaceutical companies to provide centralized, evidence-based drug information to healthcare professionals. Revenue streams are likely derived from membership fees and partnerships. The organization has established partnerships with reputable entities such as Datapharm and FDA-related resources, enhancing its credibility and reach. The target customer segment is healthcare professionals licensed in the US and Puerto Rico. Growth indicators include active partnerships and a member portal. The partnership ecosystem includes pharmaceutical industry leaders and healthcare information providers, positioning phactMI as a key player in medical information dissemination.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap in best practices. No dedicated security policy or incident response contact information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness. Data protection practices are basic, with cookie consent implemented. There is no evidence of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Compliance with GDPR is indicated but not deeply detailed. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit healthcare information site but can be improved to meet higher standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance measures.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance disclosures with detailed GDPR and data retention policies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
phactMI
Description
phactMI is a collaboration of pharmaceutical industry Medical Information (MI) leaders who are dedicated to support healthcare professionals in their commitment to provide quality patient care.
Key services
drug information database, scientific responses to healthcare professionals’ questions, interactive US approved product labels, connection to clinical experts within member companies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Bing UET, reCAPTCHA, StackAdapt, Lasso Marketing
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Bing UET, StackAdapt
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
StackAdapt, Bing Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Bing UET, StackAdapt, Lasso Marketing, Adnxs (AppNexus)
Marketing tools
reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is focused on providing drug information to healthcare professionals.
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Multiple partnerships with reputable healthcare and pharmaceutical organizations.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection.
  8. No phone numbers found; contact is primarily via email and web forms.
  9. Social media presence on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React framework with integration of multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Bing UET, StackAdapt, and Lasso Marketing. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized with responsive design. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively but could benefit from performance optimizations and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with phactmi.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review phactmi.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.