Skip to main content

Security report for pgosupport.nl

INVOLV · Healthcare · Netherlands

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

INVOLV is a Dutch non-profit organization specializing in promoting participation in healthcare, welfare, and research. They provide advisory services and training primarily targeting patients' organizations, healthcare providers, researchers, and other stakeholders. The website reflects a well-established entity with a clear mission to enhance patient and stakeholder engagement in these sectors. Their market position is that of a trusted advisor and educator within the Dutch healthcare participation ecosystem. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap for responsive design, Font Awesome for icons, and integrates analytics tools such as HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, and Ahrefs Analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and a professional design, though some accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of scripts enhancing user experience. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Security headers are not explicitly detected, suggesting room for improvement. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR adherence. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and good technical implementation. Strategic improvements in security transparency and incident response readiness would further enhance trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pgosupport.nl

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

INVOLV operates in the healthcare and non-profit sectors, focusing on patient and stakeholder participation in care, welfare, and research. Their business model centers on providing advisory services and training programs, supported by knowledge sharing through articles and interviews. The organization targets a diverse audience including patients' organizations, healthcare providers, researchers, and government bodies. Their market presence is solid within the Netherlands, with a clear niche in participatory healthcare. The website content and structured data indicate a small-sized organization with consistent branding and trust signals such as professional design and clear contact information. Partnerships appear limited to professional networks like LinkedIn, with no detected subsidiaries or parent companies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Use of reputable third-party analytics and marketing scripts is noted, though the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent gaps. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The site does not show signs of vulnerabilities or malicious content. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security policies, adding security headers, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  2. Implement and serve security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate supply chain risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
INVOLV
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
INVOLV
Description
Bij INVOLV staat alles in het teken van participatie. We geven advies en verzorgen trainingen. We doen dit voor en met patiëntenorganisaties, zorgaanbieders, onderzoekers en andere partijen in zorg en welzijn. Onze rol groeit en het belang van participatie neemt toe.
Key services
Advice on participation, Training and education, Organizational consultancy, Knowledge sharing via articles and interviews
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Font Awesome 6, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot scripts, Ahrefs Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of secure external scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Ahrefs Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics, Ahrefs Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive and relevant to healthcare participation.
  3. Clear contact information and organizational details provided.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  7. No explicit security policies or incident response info found.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with Bootstrap for responsive design and Font Awesome for iconography. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including HubSpot and Google Tag Manager, indicating a focus on user engagement and data-driven insights. Scripts are deferred where appropriate, aiding performance. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO metadata and structured data enhancing search engine visibility. However, no CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Performance is moderate, with opportunities to improve load times and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pgosupport.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pgosupport.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.