Skip to main content

Security report for pgnig.pl

Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. · Energy · Poland

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. (PGNiG) operates the website pgnig.pl, providing energy services such as gas and electricity supply primarily targeting residential customers in Poland. The website is professionally designed, consistent with the company's branding, and offers comprehensive privacy and cookie policies compliant with GDPR. The site uses modern technologies including Liferay CMS, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present, though explicit security and incident response policies are not publicly available. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business identity, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pgnig.pl

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PGNiG holds a leading position in the Polish energy market, focusing on affordable gas and electricity for homes. The business model centers on energy retail with a strong emphasis on customer service and regulatory compliance. The website integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools, indicating active engagement in digital marketing and user behavior analysis. Partnerships with recruitment and mapping services are evident, supporting operational needs. The absence of direct contact details on this page suggests contact information may be centralized elsewhere. The company demonstrates consistent branding and a clear focus on residential energy consumers.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms in place. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. However, the lack of a publicly accessible security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. The extensive use of third-party analytics and advertising scripts requires ongoing monitoring to ensure compliance and security. Overall, the site maintains a secure environment appropriate for a large energy provider but could improve by publishing explicit security and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts to minimize privacy and security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A.
Description
PGNiG OD provides affordable gas and electricity services primarily targeting residential customers in Poland.
Key services
Gas supply, Electricity supply, Customer service for home energy needs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Liferay Portal, YUI3, JavaScript, CSS3
Frameworks
Liferay
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads, Facebook Analytics, Microsoft Advertising
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google, Microsoft, Taboola
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Advertising, Taboola
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern consent management via Cookiebot.
  2. Multiple Google Tag Manager and analytics scripts are present indicating extensive tracking and marketing.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the analyzed page.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and accessible.
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  6. Site is well-branded and consistent with a large energy company.
  7. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Liferay portal platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Cookiebot is used for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. The site loads multiple external scripts asynchronously, which may impact performance but supports rich functionality. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices. SEO and metadata are well implemented, including canonical links and meta descriptions. Hosting details are not explicitly disclosed, but the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and reduce third-party script load for performance gains.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pgnig.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pgnig.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.