Skip to main content

Security report for pfser.com

Private Financial Services · Finance · Estonia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Private Financial Services (PFSER) is an established international consulting company founded in 1998, specializing in corporate services including company registration and ongoing corporate support worldwide. The company positions itself as a trusted provider for international business clients, leveraging its long-standing market presence and expertise. The website is professionally designed, primarily in Russian, with clear branding and consistent messaging targeting corporate clients seeking financial and legal consulting services. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern technology stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for compliance. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility could be improved. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security policy and incident response documentation. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and trustworthy, with extensive use of analytics and advertising networks to support marketing efforts.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pfser.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PFSER operates in the finance sector, focusing on corporate consulting and company registration services internationally. Its business model revolves around providing essential corporate services to businesses expanding globally. The company targets corporate clients, likely SMEs and international entrepreneurs, leveraging its Estonian base and multilingual website to appeal to a broad audience. The firm benefits from a long operational history since 1998, enhancing its credibility. Its digital presence includes social media channels on Facebook and Twitter, and it uses multiple marketing and analytics tools to optimize customer acquisition and engagement. No evidence of parent or subsidiary companies was found, indicating a focused, independent operation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and implements multiple security headers, indicating a mature security posture. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance with granular user controls. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response contact information suggests room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. The use of multiple third-party scripts and ad networks introduces potential risk vectors, which should be regularly audited. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security and incident response policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Add a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security maturity.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate supply chain risks.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Private Financial Services
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Private Financial Services
Description
Private Financial Services является международной консалтинговой компанией с 1998 года. Регистрируем и сопровождаем компании по всему миру.
Key services
Company registration, Corporate services, International consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, SendGrid Mailing List, Font Awesome, Select2, Owl Carousel, TweenMax, ScrollMagic, LightGallery, WordPress
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft UET, Yandex Metrica
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Microsoft Advertising, Yandex Advertising
Tracking pixels
Microsoft UET, Yandex Metrica, JivoChat
Marketing tools
SendGrid Mailing List, JivoChat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and targeted at corporate clients for international company registration and consulting.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with Cookiebot, providing GDPR compliance mechanisms.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found in the provided content.
  5. Contact information is present and includes email, phone, physical address, and contact forms.
  6. Use of multiple analytics and advertising networks with extensive tracking.
  7. Technical stack is modern and based on WordPress with common plugins and libraries.
  8. Security posture is good with HTTPS and security headers but lacks explicit security policy documentation.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a variety of modern JavaScript libraries and plugins such as jQuery, TweenMax, ScrollMagic, and Owl Carousel, indicating a rich interactive user experience. It integrates marketing and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Microsoft UET, Yandex Metrica, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site loads resources from reputable CDNs and uses minified CSS and JS for performance optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO metadata is well implemented with Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing third-party scripts and caching strategies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pfser.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pfser.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.