Skip to main content

Security report for petservice.com.mx

Pet Service · Hospitality · Mexico

High risk. 13 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 4 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pet Service is a Mexican small business specializing in a broad range of pet-related services including pet hotel accommodations, boutique products, veterinary clinic services, pet schooling, transportation, and testing. The website targets local pet owners seeking comprehensive pet care solutions. The digital presence is basic with limited content quality and minimal SEO or accessibility features. The technical infrastructure relies on older technologies such as jQuery 1.9.1 and lacks modern security headers or HTTPS enforcement visible in the HTML content. Security posture is moderate with some risks due to outdated libraries and missing security best practices. Privacy compliance is poor with no visible privacy or cookie policies. Overall, the website is functional but requires significant improvements in security, privacy, and technical modernization to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

13 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching petservice.com.mx

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality and retail sectors focused on pet services, offering diversified services that include pet hotel, boutique, veterinary clinic, pet school, transportation, and testing. The business model is service-oriented targeting pet owners in Mexico. The website indicates a local market position with no evidence of large scale or enterprise operations. The lack of detailed business information, certifications, or trust indicators limits the perceived credibility. Social media presence exists but is limited and partially incomplete. The company does not appear to use advanced marketing or analytics tools, suggesting a modest digital marketing strategy.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic with notable gaps. The use of an outdated jQuery version 1.9.1 introduces potential vulnerabilities. No HTTPS enforcement or security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, increasing risk exposure. The login form uses POST but lacks visible advanced protections like CSRF tokens. No privacy or incident response policies are published, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. The absence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files further reduces transparency. Overall, the security posture requires urgent improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement HTTPS site-wide with HSTS to ensure secure communications and improve user trust.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact channels to improve security transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pet Service
Description
Pet Service is a Mexican company offering a variety of pet-related services including hotel accommodations, boutique products, veterinary clinic services, pet school, transportation, and testing services. The website targets pet owners seeking comprehensive care and services for their pets.
Key services
Pet hotel, Boutique, Veterinary clinic, Pet school, Pet transportation, Pet testing
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.9.1, JavaScript, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Login form uses POST method

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website lacks privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies.
  2. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page; contact form present.
  3. Social media links present but some URLs incomplete or missing protocol.
  4. Uses outdated jQuery library version 1.9.1 which may pose security risks.
  5. No HTTPS enforcement or security headers visible in HTML content.
  6. Login form present but no visible CSRF tokens or advanced security measures.
  7. No structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph metadata found.
  8. Website content is in Spanish, targeting Mexican pet owners.
  9. Basic design and navigation with image-based menu items.
  10. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic web technologies including jQuery 1.9.1 and CSS with no detected CMS or modern frameworks. The HTML structure is simple but lacks meta tags, Open Graph, or structured data for SEO enhancement. Performance is moderate but mobile optimization and accessibility are poor, limiting user experience on diverse devices. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal data collection. The site relies heavily on images for navigation which may impact SEO and accessibility. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data, limiting full technical assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with petservice.com.mx. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review petservice.com.mx.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.