Skip to main content

Security report for petroleumenergy.co

Petroleum Energy · Energy · Turkey

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Petroleum Energy is a Turkey-based company specializing in services related to the production, distribution, and refining of petroleum products. The company offers a broad range of services including technical and financial feasibility studies, market and regulatory research aimed at local and foreign entrepreneurs in the energy sector. Their website positions them as a service provider with a focus on supporting energy production and sales businesses. Technically, the website uses a modern tech stack including Bootstrap and jQuery libraries, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, there is a lack of advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS confirmation, absence of security headers, and no visible privacy or cookie policies. Contact information is clearly provided, including phone, email, and physical address, along with active social media profiles. Overall, the website is professional and business-focused but requires significant improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching petroleumenergy.co

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets entrepreneurs and businesses involved in the petroleum energy sector, providing consulting and operational services. Their market position is that of a specialized service provider in energy production and distribution. The business model revolves around offering feasibility studies and regulatory research, which suggests revenue streams from consulting and project support. The website content and social media presence indicate a small-sized enterprise focused on the Turkish market with some international outreach. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company demonstrates consistent branding and professional content but lacks formal certifications or trust badges on the website.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low. The absence of HTTPS confirmation and security headers exposes the website to potential risks such as data interception and clickjacking. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. There is no vulnerability disclosure or incident response information, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The website does not appear to use analytics or tracking services that could raise privacy concerns. Overall, the security posture requires urgent enhancements to protect user data and comply with legal standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search engine ranking.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Petroleum Energy
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Petroleum Energy
Description
Petroleum Energy provides services in the production, distribution and refining of petroleum products. They offer a wide range of services including technical and financial feasibility studies, market and regulatory research to local and foreign entrepreneurs operating or wishing to operate in energy production, distribution and sales.
Key services
production of petroleum products, distribution of petroleum products, refining of petroleum products, technical feasibility studies, financial feasibility studies, market research, regulatory research
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, FontAwesome, jQuery Mousewheel, jQuery Fancybox, WOW.js, Popper.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and consistent branding.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No forms detected on the homepage or main HTML content.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond common UI libraries.
  6. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected in provided data.
  7. Social media presence includes Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and LinkedIn with official company pages.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  9. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard modern front-end stack with Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery-based plugins for UI components like carousels and animations. The site loads multiple external scripts from CDNJS and uses FontAwesome for icons. Performance is moderate with no evident broken elements. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive navigation and layout adjustments. However, there is no detected CMS or backend technology disclosed. Hosting provider information is not available from the HTML content. The site lacks advanced SEO metadata and structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph tags, limiting search engine optimization potential. Technical debt appears low but security and privacy technical implementations are lacking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with petroleumenergy.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review petroleumenergy.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.