Skip to main content

Security report for petroleum.sk

VÚRUP, a.s. · Energy · Slovakia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

VÚRUP, a.s. operates as the Slovak national committee for WPC Energy, representing Slovakia in a globally recognized energy organization focused on sustainable and low-carbon energy transitions. The website provides comprehensive information about the organization's mission, vision, values, and activities, targeting energy sector professionals, research institutions, and governmental bodies. The business model is non-profit and focuses on fostering dialogue, research, and collaboration in the energy industry. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern libraries and frameworks such as UIkit, jQuery, and Cookiebot for compliance and user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are absent. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR, making it a reliable source for stakeholders in the energy sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching petroleum.sk

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a solid market position as the official Slovak representative in WPC Energy, a globally accredited NGO by the United Nations. Its competitive advantage lies in its established network with key energy sector players, academic institutions, and government agencies. The business model is centered on non-commercial activities such as organizing conferences, supporting research, and facilitating international cooperation. Revenue streams are likely based on membership fees and grants. The target customer segments include energy professionals, researchers, and policy makers. Growth indicators include active participation in international forums and continuous content updates. The partnership ecosystem includes major Slovak energy companies and universities, enhancing credibility and influence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, implementation of security headers, and a robust cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information indicates room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Tag Manager is managed with consent, reducing privacy risks. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from formalized policies and disclosure practices.

Recommendations

  1. Develop and publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Regularly review and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet higher standards for users with disabilities.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
VÚRUP, a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VÚRUP, a.s.
Description
Slovenský výbor pri WPC Energy (SK WPC Energy) reprezentuje Slovenskú republiku v rámci globálnej inštitúcie WPC Energy, ktorá je vedúcou organizáciou v globálnom energetickom sektore. Organizácia sa zameriava na podporu udržateľného riadenia a využívania svetových energetických zdrojov, podporuje dialóg medzi výrobcami a spotrebiteľmi energie a organizuje kongresy a odborné podujatia.
Key services
Reprezentácia Slovenska pri WPC Energy, Organizovanie odborných podujatí, konferencií, seminárov, Podpora vedeckých inštitúcií a publikácií, Medzinárodná spolupráca a výmena informácií
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Yoast SEO, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Swiper.js, FontAwesome
Frameworks
UIkit
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professionally presented in Slovak language with English option
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with emails and phone numbers
  5. No terms of service page found
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  7. No visible security or privacy policy pages beyond GDPR privacy statement
  8. No explicit security incident response or vulnerability disclosure information
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform enhanced with UIkit for UI components, jQuery for scripting, and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. Cookiebot is used for GDPR-compliant cookie management. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for analytics and tracking, respecting user consent. The site demonstrates moderate performance with responsive design and mobile optimization. Technical debt appears low with modern libraries and no deprecated scripts detected. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and to optimize loading times further. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with petroleum.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review petroleum.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.