Skip to main content

Security report for petersonlighthouse.com

Peterson · Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Peterson Lighthouse is a B2B software ecosystem focused on digitalizing the end-to-end logistics supply chain, particularly for the energy and transportation sectors. The platform offers a suite of specialized applications that enhance visibility, planning, and management of logistics operations, including port activity, transport management, and vessel activity capturing. The company positions itself as an expert-driven provider leveraging decades of logistics experience to deliver operational efficiencies and advanced analytics. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and LinkedIn Insight, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections, but lacks advanced DNS security (DNSSEC) and security headers. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service found. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, with room for improvement in security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching petersonlighthouse.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention petersonlighthouse.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
7
Employees
0
Customers
7
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
43%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for petersonlighthouse.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Peterson Lighthouse operates in a niche market serving energy logistics and port operations with a comprehensive software suite. Their business model centers on providing SaaS solutions that improve operational decision-making and supply chain transparency. The company leverages its parent company's logistics expertise to differentiate itself. The website content and structured data reflect a medium-sized enterprise with a focus on international energy logistics. Marketing efforts include extensive use of analytics and tracking tools, suggesting a data-driven approach to customer engagement. The absence of explicit contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests lead generation via contact forms. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the domain data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain registrar protections. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represent gaps that could be exploited. No public security policies or incident response contacts are published, which may impact trust for security-conscious clients. The use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts increases the attack surface and requires careful management to avoid vulnerabilities. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement and publish security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and data protection officer to enhance incident response readiness and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Peterson
Description
Lighthouse is an ecosystem of software applications that digitalises the end-to-end logistics supply chain, developed by Peterson, an international energy logistics and supply chain solutions company.
Key services
Time and cost allocation, CCU fleet management, Quayside management, Third party rental management, Backload management, Port activity planning, Offshore transport requests, Transport management, Vessel activity capturing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Select2, Swiper, HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight, Snitcher
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS and registrar

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight, Snitcher
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight, Snitcher
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight, Snitcher
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear branding and consistent messaging.
  2. Content is focused on logistics and energy supply chain software solutions.
  3. Multiple software applications are described with detailed features.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or main navigation.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is present and active.
  6. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no explicit emails or phone numbers found in the provided content.
  7. Use of multiple marketing and analytics tools indicates active user tracking.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  10. WHOIS data is transparent and domain is not privacy protected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building, supported by JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Select2, and Swiper for UI components. Integration with HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight, and Snitcher indicates a sophisticated marketing and analytics setup. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with some scope for optimization. Accessibility is basic but functional. No critical technical issues were detected, though improvements in security headers and DNS security are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with petersonlighthouse.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review petersonlighthouse.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.