Skip to main content

Security report for perversefamily.com

Perverse Family · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Perverse Family is an adult entertainment website specializing in extreme and fetish-themed pornographic video content. The site operates on a subscription-based model, offering high-quality 4K videos and live streaming through related platforms. The business targets an adult-only audience interested in niche fetish content. Technically, the website uses modern JavaScript, Cloudflare DNS, and Matomo analytics, with a custom or proprietary CMS. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO practices, but lacks some accessibility features and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain locking, but DNSSEC is not enabled and some security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy and terms of service present but no clear GDPR consent mechanisms or incident response policies. Overall, the domain registration is consistent and legitimate for the business type, with no suspicious patterns detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching perversefamily.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche segment in the adult entertainment industry, focusing on extreme fetish content under a branded 'perverse family' theme. It leverages a network of partner sites to expand its reach and offers both on-demand videos and live streaming services. The business model relies on membership subscriptions, targeting mature adults seeking specialized adult content. The presence of multiple related domains and billing support services indicates a structured operational ecosystem. However, the lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers and limited public business information suggests a small to medium-sized operation with a focus on digital distribution rather than physical presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections enabled. However, the absence of DNSSEC and some recommended security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy) indicates room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance gaps, especially regarding cookie consent and GDPR adherence, present potential regulatory risks. Overall, the security posture is functional but could benefit from enhanced controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Add recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  5. Provide clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Perverse Family
Description
Adult entertainment website offering extreme and twisted pornographic video content featuring a fictional 'perverse family' theme.
Key services
Adult video streaming, Membership access, Live streaming (via related site)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Matomo Analytics, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain locked status in WHOIS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed adult entertainment platform specializing in extreme fetish content.
  2. Content is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  3. WHOIS data shows domain is locked and registered with a major registrar.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms detected, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps.
  5. Multiple external partner domains linked, indicating a network of related adult sites.
  6. Uses Matomo analytics for user tracking.
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via web form.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts (Matomo). DNS is managed via Cloudflare, providing resilience and performance benefits. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. Hosting details are not explicit but likely involve CDN and cloud infrastructure. Performance appears moderate with video streaming capabilities. The absence of a known CMS suggests a custom-built platform tailored for adult content delivery. Technical debt is minimal based on available data, but improvements in accessibility and security headers are recommended to reduce risk and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with perversefamily.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review perversefamily.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.