Skip to main content

Security report for personaltours.hu

Personal Tours · Hospitality · Hungary

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Personal Tours is a well-established Hungarian travel agency specializing in personalized travel packages primarily to Greek islands and exotic destinations. With nearly three decades of experience, the company offers a variety of services including flight-inclusive trips, individual accommodation bookings, cruises, and city tours. The website reflects a professional and user-friendly design, targeting Hungarian-speaking travelers seeking affordable and customized holiday options. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and integrates marketing and analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement, reCAPTCHA for forms, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not present on the site, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy, well-maintained, and provides a solid digital presence for the business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching personaltours.hu

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position in the Hungarian travel sector, leveraging its long-standing history and personalized service offerings. Its business model focuses on packaged and individual travel services, catering to a diverse customer base interested in Mediterranean and exotic vacations. The integration with partner domains for travel packages and cruises indicates a collaborative ecosystem enhancing service breadth. The website's content and navigation are tailored to facilitate easy discovery of travel options, supporting customer engagement and conversion. The presence of social media and marketing tools suggests active digital marketing efforts. No suspicious or fraudulent indicators were found, supporting the company's credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled, use of reCAPTCHA to prevent automated abuse, and a detailed cookie consent framework aligned with GDPR requirements. Security headers are partially present, but there is room to enhance them further. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The absence of a security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Regular audits of third-party scripts and implementation of a security.txt file would strengthen the security framework. Overall, the site is secure for users but could improve in formalizing security policies and incident handling.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a publicly accessible security policy page detailing security practices and user protections.
  2. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosures and improve incident response readiness.
  3. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Include explicit contact information for security incidents or abuse reports to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Conduct regular third-party script audits and update dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Personal Tours
Description
Personal Tours is a travel organizer specializing in Greek, Italian, Croatian, Spanish vacations for 29 years, offering First Minute and Last Minute deals, personalized offers, tours, city visits, cruises, and exotic trips.
Key services
Flight-inclusive trips to Greek islands, Exotic travel packages, Individual accommodation bookings, Cruises and city tours, Last Minute and First Minute deals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, CookieYes (cookie consent), Google reCAPTCHA, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed categories.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented and consistent.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies found on the site.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools is evident.
  6. Content is professionally presented and relevant to travel industry.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for interactivity, and FontAwesome for icons. It integrates third-party services such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and CookieYes for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility basics, though some improvements could be made. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts and large image assets. The absence of a known CMS suggests a custom-built platform, which may require dedicated maintenance. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional user experience but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with personaltours.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review personaltours.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.