Skip to main content

Security report for perrigo.com

Perrigo Company plc · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Perrigo Company plc is a well-established enterprise in the healthcare sector, specializing in manufacturing and distributing trusted consumer self-care products globally. With a history dating back to 1887, Perrigo has positioned itself as a leader in affordable and high-quality self-care solutions, serving markets primarily in North America and Europe. The website reflects a mature business with comprehensive corporate responsibility initiatives and a strong investor relations presence. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as Slick Carousel and Google Tag Manager for analytics and user experience enhancements. The site is hosted on Amazon S3 for assets, ensuring reliable content delivery. Mobile optimization and accessibility are well addressed, contributing to a positive user experience. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses Content Security Policy nonces, and integrates OneTrust for cookie consent management, demonstrating good privacy compliance and security hygiene. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates areas for improvement. Overall, Perrigo's website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, supporting its business credibility. Strategic enhancements in security transparency and incident response readiness would further strengthen its security posture and stakeholder trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
63/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching perrigo.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
90
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
63
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention perrigo.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
179
Employees
39
Customers
84
Third parties
56
Weak passwords
16%

Latest record dated 2026-06-12 · 18 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for perrigo.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –adfs.perrigo.com2026-06-12
  • –adfs.perrigo.com2026-05-27
  • –adfs.perrigo.com2026-05-20
  • –pwm.perrigo.com2026-05-18
  • –pwm.perrigo.com2026-05-18

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Perrigo operates as an essential entity in the healthcare industry, focusing on consumer self-care products. Its business model centers on manufacturing and private label solutions, targeting consumers who seek affordable and reliable health products. The company maintains a strong market position with subsidiaries and regional sites across multiple countries, reflecting a global footprint. The website content emphasizes corporate responsibility, sustainability, and community engagement through the Perrigo Foundation, highlighting a socially responsible brand image. Investor relations and career opportunities are prominently featured, indicating a mature and transparent corporate structure. The use of OneTrust and Google Tag Manager reflects a commitment to privacy and data-driven marketing strategies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforcement and Content Security Policy implementation. The integration of OneTrust for cookie consent aligns with GDPR and other privacy regulations, enhancing compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure program suggests limited transparency in security governance. Adding these elements would improve incident readiness and stakeholder confidence. Security headers beyond CSP nonce are not explicitly identified, and additional headers like X-Frame-Options or X-XSS-Protection could be beneficial. Overall, the security posture is good but could be elevated with enhanced policy disclosures and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy page accessible from the website footer or corporate responsibility section.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy and host a security.txt file at the domain root.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers by adding X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Referrer-Policy.
  5. Continue to monitor and update third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Perrigo Company plc
Description
Perrigo provides high-quality, affordable self-care products that empower consumers to proactively prevent or treat conditions that can be self-managed. The company has a rich history dating back to 1887 and focuses on expanding its self-care portfolio globally.
Key services
Consumer self-care products, Private label manufacturing, Corporate responsibility initiatives, Philanthropy through Perrigo Foundation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, JavaScript, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Content Security Policy nonce
  • Cookie consent with OneTrust
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Drupal 10 CMS with modern JavaScript libraries.
  2. Strong corporate branding and consistent messaging.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via OneTrust.
  4. No direct email or phone contact information found in HTML; contact via contact form.
  5. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Twitter, and Facebook.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. Good mobile optimization and accessibility features.
  9. Assets hosted on Amazon S3 and CDN services.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, indicating a modern and supported content management system. It uses JavaScript libraries such as Slick Carousel for interactive elements and Google Tag Manager for analytics integration. Assets are served from Amazon S3, ensuring scalable and reliable delivery. The site includes responsive design elements and accessibility features like skip links and ARIA roles, enhancing usability. Meta tags and canonical links are properly set for SEO optimization. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented via OneTrust, providing granular user control over tracking. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading of images and asynchronous script loading. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust, with opportunities to improve security headers and incident response mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with perrigo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review perrigo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.