Skip to main content

Security report for peoplesproject.com

People’s Project.com · Non-profit · Ukraine

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

People’s Project.com is a Ukrainian volunteer center focused on supporting the Ukrainian Army and providing treatment for severely wounded soldiers using unique technologies. The website positions itself as a national volunteer hub with a humanitarian mission. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and integrates common analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar. The site uses HTTPS and shows moderate performance and mobile optimization. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks security headers and explicit policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and no clear contact information. Overall, the site appears professional and trustworthy in content but suffers from critical gaps in domain registration transparency and privacy compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of peoplesproject.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching peoplesproject.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector, targeting Ukrainian citizens and supporters of the Ukrainian Army. Its business model is volunteer and donation-based, focusing on humanitarian aid and medical treatment. The website content is consistent and well-branded, with trust signals such as Google site verification and social media presence. The lack of detailed company registration or contact information limits full business credibility assessment. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data. The site’s market position is as a national volunteer center with a clear mission but limited public business disclosures.

Security posture

The website has a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers and formal security or incident response policies. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. The absence of contact information for security incidents and privacy policies indicates compliance gaps. The domain’s unverified WHOIS data further reduces trust. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in policy transparency and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is publicly available to improve trust.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security inquiries.
  4. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to enhance security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
People’s Project.com
Description
Допомога українській Армії. Лікування тяжкопоранених бійців. Унікальні технології. Центр волонтерів Народний проект | People's Project
Key services
Support to Ukrainian Army, Treatment of severely wounded soldiers, Use of unique technologies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Elementor
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Ukrainian language targeting Ukrainian audience
  2. No WHOIS registration data found for domain
  3. Website uses HTTPS and modern tracking technologies
  4. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in content
  6. No security or incident response policies found
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  8. Content is focused on volunteer support and humanitarian aid
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with Elementor page builder. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar for analytics and marketing. The site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. Performance is moderate with some optimization potential. Mobile responsiveness is good. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No hosting provider information was detected. The site could benefit from improved security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with peoplesproject.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review peoplesproject.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.