Skip to main content

Security report for peoplesproject.com

People’s Project.com · Non-profit · Ukraine

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

People’s Project.com is a Ukrainian volunteer center focused on supporting the Ukrainian Army and providing treatment for severely wounded soldiers using unique technologies. The website positions itself as a national non-profit organization with a medium-sized presence in Ukraine. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Elementor and photo gallery tools, and it integrates analytics and tracking services like Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar. The site is accessible, uses HTTPS, and has moderate performance and mobile optimization. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site appears legitimate in content and purpose but requires improvements in transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching peoplesproject.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector, targeting Ukrainian citizens and supporters of the Ukrainian military. Its business model revolves around volunteer coordination and fundraising for military aid and healthcare. The website content is professionally presented with consistent branding and clear messaging. The presence of Google site verification and Facebook page linkage adds trust signals. The lack of explicit contact information and domain registration data suggests a need for enhanced transparency. The organization likely relies on donations and volunteer engagement as revenue streams. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data provided.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. The use of third-party analytics and tracking services introduces privacy considerations. No explicit incident response or security policies are published. The absence of WHOIS data is a risk factor for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and ensuring domain registration transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Obtain and verify domain registration details to enhance legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  4. Publish incident response and security policies to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain platform security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
People’s Project.com
Description
Допомога українській Армії. Лікування тяжкопоранених бійців. Унікальні технології. Центр волонтерів Народний проект | People's Project
Key services
Support to Ukrainian Army, Treatment of severely wounded soldiers, Use of unique technologies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Hotjar, Photo Gallery plugin, Elementor
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google site verification
  • Facebook domain verification

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Ukrainian language targeting Ukrainian audience
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, domain may be unregistered or WHOIS blocked
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in provided content
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in content
  5. Uses multiple tracking and analytics services
  6. No security headers detected in provided data
  7. Website uses WordPress CMS with Elementor and photo gallery plugins
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor and photo gallery plugins, indicating a modern and flexible content management approach. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, and Hotjar for user behavior tracking. The site uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data indicate technical and operational gaps that could affect long-term reliability and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with peoplesproject.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review peoplesproject.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.