Skip to main content

Security report for penzionuwernera.cz

Penzion u Wernera · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Penzion u Wernera is a small family-run guesthouse located in Krupka near Teplice, Czech Republic, offering affordable accommodation with amenities such as private bathrooms, breakfast options, secure parking, and free Wi-Fi. The business has a longstanding tradition since 1994 and targets travelers seeking budget-friendly lodging in the region. The website is well-structured, visually appealing, and mobile-optimized, integrating Google Maps for location services and employing modern frontend technologies including slick carousel and Google Fonts. Security measures include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, though the absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates room for improvement. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly diminishes domain trust, but the website content and contact details support the legitimacy of the business. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy image suitable for its hospitality market niche.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching penzionuwernera.cz

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
65
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate penzionuwernera.cz and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
2
Registered
2
Resolving
2
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-20

Masked preview

  • pe•••••••••••.ra.czLowsubdomain
  • pe•••••••••.nera.czLowsubdomain

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of penzionuwernera.cz with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector as a small-scale pension offering lodging services with additional amenities such as breakfast, laundry, and grilling facilities. Its market position is that of a local, family-owned accommodation provider with a focus on affordability and comfort. The target audience includes tourists and travelers visiting Krupka and nearby Teplice. The business model relies on direct bookings and local reputation, with no evident online marketing or social media presence. The website lacks formal privacy and cookie policies, which may affect compliance with data protection regulations. The absence of WHOIS data and certifications suggests limited digital maturity but does not contradict the business's local operational focus.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, which are positive security indicators. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No forms are present, minimizing attack surface, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, formal policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish terms of service and incident response contact information to increase transparency and trust.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain registration transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Penzion u Wernera
Description
Rodinný penzion v Krupce u Teplic nabízí levné ubytování s možností snídaně, grilování, nonstop recepci a bezpečné parkování. Pokoje mají vlastní sociální zařízení, wifi zdarma a další vybavení pro pohodlí hostů.
Key services
levné ubytování, pokoje s vlastním sociálním zařízením, možnost snídaně, uzavíratelné parkování, terasa s grilem, nonstop recepce, wifi zdarma, vyprání prádla po dohodě
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Maps API, jQuery (implied by slick slider usage), Slick Carousel, Google Fonts, reCAPTCHA
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, and physical address.
  5. Website uses modern frontend technologies and Google Maps integration.
  6. No social media links or business certifications are present.
  7. No forms detected on the page; contact is via email and phone only.
  8. Security headers are not visible in the provided data; recommend adding them.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected except Google reCAPTCHA.
  10. Content is family-friendly hospitality focused with no adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack including Google Fonts, slick carousel for image sliders, and Google Maps API for location display. It is mobile-optimized with responsive images and viewport settings. The site loads external scripts asynchronously, including Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. No CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Accessibility is basic but functional. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. The absence of analytics scripts suggests minimal user tracking, which aligns with privacy considerations but limits marketing insights.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with penzionuwernera.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review penzionuwernera.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.