Skip to main content

Security report for penize.cz

NextPage Media, s.r.o. · Finance · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NextPage Media, s.r.o. operates Peníze.cz, the largest Czech website dedicated to personal finance. The site offers comprehensive financial news, advice, product comparisons, calculators, and market data targeting Czech internet users interested in managing their finances. The company is a subsidiary of Partners HoldCo and manages several related media properties, positioning itself as a key player in the Czech financial media sector. Technically, the website employs a modern JavaScript stack with multiple third-party advertising and analytics integrations, including consent management to comply with privacy regulations. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and some security headers, though additional enhancements are recommended. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trust but the business information and content quality support legitimacy. Overall, the site is professional, content-rich, and well-optimized for users.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching penize.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
90
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention penize.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
393
Employees
0
Customers
346
Third parties
47
Weak passwords
30%

5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for penize.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as the leading Czech personal finance portal, leveraging a diversified content offering and affiliate partnerships. Its business model relies on advertising revenue and financial product referrals. The target audience includes Czech consumers seeking financial information and tools. The parent company, Partners HoldCo, provides strategic backing and brand recognition. The presence of multiple subsidiary media sites enhances cross-promotion and audience reach. Growth indicators include frequent content updates and integration of modern marketing technologies. The partnership ecosystem includes major ad networks and financial service providers, supporting monetization and user engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, use of a consent management platform, and some security headers. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. However, the lack of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and a security.txt file indicates room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. Compliance with GDPR is partially addressed via cookie consent but a dedicated privacy policy page was not clearly identified. The security culture appears to be evolving but could benefit from formalized documentation and enhanced header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response readiness.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents, including dedicated security or abuse email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and advertising integrations to minimize risk from vulnerable or malicious libraries.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
NextPage Media, s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ24780553
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NextPage Media, s.r.o.
Description
Společnost NextPage Media vznikla v prosinci 2010. Je dceřinou společností Partners HoldCo. Pod křídla naší společnosti patří weby Peníze.cz, Finmag.cz, Heroine.cz, FootballClub.cz nebo Peniaze.sk a tištěné časopisy Finmag a Heroine
Key services
Financial news and articles, Financial product comparisons, Financial calculators, Currency exchange rates, Stock market data, Social benefits information, Tax and pension information
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Didomi Consent Management, Caroda Video Player, Prebid.js, Criteo Publisher Tag, Seznam SSP, Gemius Analytics, Tinypass/Piano, CSS Flickity Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of consent management platform
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Gemius, Ahrefs Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Tinypass/Piano
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Caroda, Criteo, Seznam SSP, R2B2
Tracking pixels
Gemius, Ahrefs Analytics, Didomi CMP, Tinypass/Piano
Marketing tools
Didomi Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a major Czech personal finance portal with extensive content and tools.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Uses multiple third-party advertising and analytics services.
  4. Has cookie consent and privacy management mechanisms implemented.
  5. No explicit contact phone numbers found; only email in structured data.
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content.
  7. Website is well designed, mobile optimized, and content rich.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-heavy front-end with asynchronous loading of multiple third-party scripts for advertising, analytics, and consent management. Technologies include Google Tag Manager, Didomi CMP, Caroda video player, Prebid.js for header bidding, and Criteo retargeting. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses CSS Flickity for carousels. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in script loading and caching. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not evident. SEO is well supported with meta tags, Open Graph, and structured JSON-LD data. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 61/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with penize.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review penize.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.