Skip to main content

Security report for pengeskole.dk

Pengeskole.dk · Finance · Denmark

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pengeskole.dk is a Danish financial education website founded in 2018, offering a wide range of guides and articles on earning money, investing in stocks, cryptocurrency, and crowdlending. The site targets Danish-speaking individuals interested in improving their personal finances and investment knowledge. It operates primarily as a content publishing platform with affiliate marketing partnerships, positioning itself as a niche player in the Danish finance education market. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using popular SEO and content plugins, with a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, and the Google Analytics plugin is installed but not configured. Privacy compliance is limited, with a privacy and cookie policy page present but no active consent mechanism. Contact information is limited to a contact form with no direct emails or phone numbers published. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and user protection.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pengeskole.dk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
50
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pengeskole.dk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pengeskole.dk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website leverages content marketing and affiliate partnerships to monetize its financial education content. It maintains partnerships and sister sites in related Nordic markets, indicating a strategy to expand reach and credibility. The business model focuses on providing actionable financial advice and investment reviews, targeting individuals seeking to increase income and manage finances better. The presence of multiple categories and regularly updated articles suggests active content management. However, the lack of direct contact details and formal policies may limit business credibility for some users. Growth potential exists through improved privacy compliance and enhanced security measures.

Security posture

Pengeskole.dk demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces its defense against certain attacks. The presence of an unconfigured Google Analytics plugin may pose privacy risks. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, indicating limited transparency in security governance. The site should prioritize implementing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security and incident response information to improve its security maturity and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement essential security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Configure or remove unused Google Analytics plugin to avoid unnecessary data collection and potential privacy issues.
  4. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  5. Publish clear security policies and incident response contact information to improve trust and preparedness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pengeskole.dk
Description
Pengeskole.dk is a Danish website focused on providing guides and information about ways to earn money, investing in stocks, cryptocurrency, crowdlending, and personal finance tips.
Key services
Financial guides, Investment advice, Crowdlending reviews, Cryptocurrency education, Affiliate marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Schema plugin, Atomic Blocks, Genesis Blocks, Neve Theme, jQuery
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
AdServiceMedia
Tracking pixels
GetSiteControl
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Danish financial education and money-making guide platform.
  2. Content is well structured with multiple categories and articles.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner found despite cookie policy page.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers; contact is via form only.
  5. No security policy or incident response information published.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. Uses WordPress with common SEO and content plugins.
  8. No DNSSEC enabled for domain.
  9. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  10. Google Analytics plugin installed but not configured.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with a well-known theme (Neve) and SEO plugins (Yoast SEO, Schema plugin). It uses JavaScript libraries like jQuery and includes affiliate link management tools. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security configuration. The site could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced accessibility features to improve overall user experience and technical robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pengeskole.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pengeskole.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.