Skip to main content

Security report for peek-cloppenburg.de

Fashion ID GmbH & Co. KG · Retail · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Peek & Cloppenburg operates a large-scale e-commerce platform specializing in fashion retail, offering a wide range of clothing, shoes, and accessories from over 300 top brands. The company targets a broad general audience in Germany and maintains a strong market position as a well-established fashion retailer with both online and physical store presence. The website demonstrates a high level of digital maturity, utilizing modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, along with marketing and consent management tools like Kameleoon and Cookielaw.org. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a professional user experience with clear navigation and comprehensive product categorization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security best practices like security headers and explicit incident response contacts are not evident. Privacy compliance is moderate due to the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies in the provided content. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally managed, with room for improvement in privacy transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching peek-cloppenburg.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail and e-commerce sectors, focusing on fashion products for women, men, and children. It leverages a multi-brand strategy to attract diverse customer segments and offers services such as fast delivery and extended return policies. The company is large in size, headquartered in Düsseldorf, Germany, and uses structured data to enhance SEO and user engagement. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok supports brand visibility and customer interaction. The absence of privacy and cookie policies in the visible content suggests potential compliance gaps. The company appears to have a robust partnership ecosystem with various fashion brands but no explicit partner or subsidiary domains were identified. The business model is primarily direct-to-consumer online retail complemented by physical stores.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern web frameworks, contributing to a secure browsing environment. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is found, which limits transparency and incident response readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Forms appear to be standard with no obvious insecure inputs. The security score is good but could be improved by adopting additional security best practices and publishing clear security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page to improve transparency and incident response.
  4. Enhance cookie consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance and user control.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities and improve performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Fashion ID GmbH & Co. KG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fashion ID GmbH & Co. KG
Description
Jetzt bei ➧ P&C: Mode & Schuhe online entdecken | mehr als 300 Top-Marken | versandkostenfrei | 62 Tage Rückgaberecht
Key services
Online fashion retail, Clothing and shoes sales, Multiple brand offerings, Customer service, Store locator and physical stores
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Kameleoon (A/B testing), Content Intelligence (CIO autocomplete), Cookielaw.org scripts
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-related scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Kameleoon
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Kameleoon
Tracking pixels
Cookielaw.org
Marketing tools
Kameleoon, Cookielaw.org
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform for fashion retail.
  2. Content is comprehensive with extensive product categories and brand listings.
  3. Strong use of structured data for SEO and business information.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages detected in provided content.
  5. Contact information includes customer service phone and physical address in Düsseldorf, Germany.
  6. Uses modern web technologies and third-party marketing/consent tools.
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  8. No signs of WAF blocking or content restrictions.
  9. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React/Next.js stack, ensuring good performance and SEO capabilities. It uses third-party services for A/B testing (Kameleoon) and cookie consent management (Cookielaw.org). The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and accessible navigation. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Hosting details are not explicit but domain DNS is managed by CSC, indicating professional domain management. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of scripts and preloading of fonts and images. Technical risks include reliance on third-party marketing scripts and lack of explicit security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 50/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with peek-cloppenburg.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review peek-cloppenburg.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.