Skip to main content

Security report for peakhealth.org

Peak Health · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Peak Health is a regional health insurance provider headquartered in Morgantown, West Virginia, owned by three established not-for-profit healthcare providers. The company offers health insurance plans including Medicare Advantage PPO plans, focusing on improving health outcomes for West Virginians and surrounding communities. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with good content quality and clear navigation. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with the Divi theme and uses modern web technologies and tracking tools, though some privacy compliance aspects are lacking. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain transfer protection, but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, indicating a legitimate and trustworthy entity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching peakhealth.org

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Peak Health operates in the healthcare insurance sector with a provider-led business model, leveraging partnerships with WVU Health System, Marshall Health Network, and Valley Health. This collaborative ownership structure provides a competitive advantage in the regional market. The company targets residents of West Virginia and nearby areas, offering tailored insurance products. The website's content and partnerships indicate a medium-sized organization with a focus on community health improvement. The presence of Medicare Advantage plans suggests a revenue stream from government healthcare programs. The partnership ecosystem is strong, enhancing market credibility and operational reach.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and has domain transfer protections in place, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents areas for improvement. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which limits transparency. The use of third-party tracking and marketing tools is moderate, but privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are missing, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for enhancement in policy publication and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to harden the website against common web attacks.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Complete configuration of analytics tools and ensure data retention policies are clearly stated to enhance privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Peak Health
Description
Peak Health is a health insurer and health insurance services company headquartered in Morgantown, West Virginia. Owned by three not-for-profit health care providers: WVU Health System, Marshall Health Network, and Valley Health. It aims to be an inclusive, provider-led health plan helping residents of West Virginia and beyond live healthier and fuller lives.
Key services
Health insurance plans, Medicare Advantage PPO plans, Health insurance services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, Algolia Search, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Divi Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained healthcare insurance provider site.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on the homepage or linked menus.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage content.
  4. Uses modern web technologies and tracking tools but lacks full privacy compliance.
  5. WHOIS data shows long-term domain registration with no privacy protection.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn confirmed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, leveraging jQuery and Algolia for search functionality. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Bing Ads for marketing and analytics. Hosting appears to be via WP Engine, a reputable managed WordPress host. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph metadata. Technical debt is low, but improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are needed to modernize the security posture and regulatory adherence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with peakhealth.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review peakhealth.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.