Skip to main content

Security report for peaceguam.org

Guam Behavioral Health and Wellness Center · Healthcare · Guam

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Guam Behavioral Health and Wellness Center (GBHWC) operates the PEACE website as a government portal providing comprehensive behavioral health and substance abuse services to the residents of Guam. The site serves as an informational and service access point for various mental health programs, crisis counseling, and prevention initiatives. It holds a primary market position as the main behavioral health provider in the region, supported by government affiliation and CARF accreditation. The target audience includes adults and children on Guam seeking mental health and substance abuse assistance. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 7 CMS with a range of JavaScript libraries for enhanced user experience and analytics integration, including Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and accessibility, offering features such as text resizing and high contrast modes. Performance is moderate, with room for modernization and improved SEO practices. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with anonymized IP tracking for analytics, but lacks explicit security headers and a cookie consent mechanism. The use of an outdated CMS version (Drupal 7) poses potential security risks. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Incident response and security policies are not publicly documented, indicating areas for improvement. Overall, the website is functional and trustworthy as a government health service portal but would benefit from enhanced security practices, privacy compliance improvements, and technical modernization to strengthen its security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching peaceguam.org

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention peaceguam.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for peaceguam.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GBHWC operates as a government entity providing essential healthcare services focused on behavioral health and substance abuse. Its business model is service-oriented, funded and managed by the Government of Guam. The organization holds a strong market position as the primary provider of mental health services on the island, supported by accreditation and government backing. Revenue streams likely derive from government funding and grants. The target customers are Guam residents requiring mental health and substance abuse support. The website ecosystem includes partnerships with accreditation bodies like CARF and government portals such as guam.gov. Growth indicators include a broad range of services and community outreach programs. Strategic observations suggest opportunities for digital transformation and enhanced user engagement through improved content and security features.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced with privacy-conscious analytics settings. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The outdated Drupal 7 CMS version introduces potential vulnerabilities if not regularly patched. No public security or incident response policies were found, limiting transparency and preparedness. The site does not implement a cookie consent mechanism, which is a compliance gap under GDPR and related regulations. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security culture appears basic with room for significant improvement in policy publication, technical controls, and compliance adherence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce modern security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Upgrade the CMS from Drupal 7 to a supported, secure version to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Deploy a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  4. Publish clear security and incident response policies accessible to users and stakeholders.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Guam Behavioral Health and Wellness Center
Description
Guam Behavioral Health and Substance Abuse (GBHWC) provides comprehensive mental health, alcohol and drug programs and services for adults and children on Guam.
Key services
Child Adolescent Services, Community Support Services, Day Treatment Services, Adult Counseling, Drug & Alcohol Treatment, Healing Hearts Rape Crisis Center, 988 Lifeline, Emergency Services, Medication Clinic, Nursing Services
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 7, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, ShareThis, Colorbox, bxSlider, iframeResizer
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google Analytics anonymize IP enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
ShareThis
Marketing tools
ShareThis
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a government health service portal for Guam Behavioral Health and Wellness Center
  2. Content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms
  3. Uses Drupal 7 CMS with multiple JavaScript libraries for UI and analytics
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected
  5. Contact information is available via a dedicated contact page
  6. Security headers are not explicitly present in HTML content
  7. Website includes accessibility features such as text resizing and high contrast mode
  8. Includes CARF accreditation logo as a trust indicator
  9. External links mostly to government and trusted domains
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is based on Drupal 7 CMS, which is outdated and may pose security and maintenance challenges. The tech stack includes common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Colorbox, and bxSlider, alongside Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is hosted on a government domain (gbhwc.guam.gov) indicating controlled hosting environment. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features implemented. SEO practices are basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site uses iframe embedding for PEACE content, which may affect performance and SEO. Technical debt is evident due to legacy CMS and lack of modern security headers. Opportunities exist for modernization, improved performance, and enhanced user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with peaceguam.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review peaceguam.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.