Skip to main content

Security report for paymer.com

Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Paymer.com operates a digital payment platform specializing in digital checks backed by WebMoney and various cryptocurrencies. The service enables users and merchants to securely issue, verify, and redeem digital checks for online payments without requiring traditional banking or crypto wallets. The platform targets merchants and individual users seeking efficient and irrevocable payment methods. The website is bilingual (Russian and English) and provides detailed service descriptions, benefits, and usage instructions. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap 5 and jQuery, with SVG icons and web fonts for a professional appearance. The site is mobile optimized and uses HTTPS for secure communications. However, it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and explicit contact information, which are areas for improvement. The domain is long-established since 2001, registered with EuroDNS S.A., and shows no signs of privacy protection or suspicious registration patterns, supporting its legitimacy. Overall, the site presents a moderate security posture with room for enhancement in compliance and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching paymer.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention paymer.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,278
Employees
0
Customers
1,278
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
12%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for paymer.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Paymer.com occupies a niche in the digital payments sector, focusing on digital checks as a payment instrument backed by WebMoney and cryptocurrencies. Its business model revolves around facilitating secure, instant, and irrevocable online payments without traditional financial intermediaries. The platform offers services such as check issuance, verification, fund transfers, and merchant payment acceptance via links and APIs. The target market includes merchants seeking commission-free, global payment acceptance and users desiring secure digital payment methods. The company benefits from a long domain history and consistent branding but lacks visible certifications or trust seals. The absence of contact details and privacy policies may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly identified. The platform’s competitive advantage lies in its unique payment instrument and integration with popular digital currencies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of anti-forgery tokens in forms, indicating awareness of common web security practices. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers (such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), and published security policies or incident response contacts limits its security maturity. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, reducing transparency for security researchers. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but would benefit from implementing advanced security headers, formal policies, and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  4. Provide clear contact information including support emails and phone numbers, and publish a security policy with incident response contacts.
  5. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Paymer offers digital checks backed by WebMoney and cryptocurrencies, enabling secure payments, issuance of checks of any denomination, and payouts. The service targets merchants and users seeking secure, instant, and irrevocable online payments without the need for cards, bank accounts, or crypto wallets.
Key services
Issuance of digital checks, Verification of checks, Transfer of funds to WebMoney and cryptocurrencies, Merchant payment acceptance via payment links and API
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 5, Custom JavaScript, SVG icons, Web fonts (Inter)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of POST with anti-forgery token in forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides a specialized digital payment service using digital checks backed by WebMoney and cryptocurrencies.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the page.
  4. Site uses HTTPS and modern frontend technologies but lacks visible advanced security headers.
  5. No social media or external business contact links detected.
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Content is in Russian and English with language toggle available.
  8. Forms use anti-forgery tokens indicating some security awareness.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Bootstrap 5 and jQuery, ensuring responsive design and interactive features. SVG icons and web fonts contribute to a professional visual identity. The site loads resources from a reputable CDN (jsdelivr.net) and uses HTTPS exclusively, supporting secure data transmission. The form includes anti-forgery tokens, indicating protection against CSRF attacks. However, no CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate with no obvious heavy scripts or trackers. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is basic with meta description and viewport tags but lacks Open Graph or structured data markup. The absence of advanced security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt in security and compliance domains.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with paymer.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review paymer.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.