Skip to main content

Security report for pata.org

Pacific Asia Travel Association · Hospitality · Thailand

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pacific Asia Travel Association (PATA) is a well-established non-profit organization dedicated to promoting responsible travel and tourism development in the Asia Pacific region. The website serves as a comprehensive platform offering membership services, events, research, and capacity building programs targeted at travel industry professionals, government agencies, and students. The organization maintains a strong market position as a regional leader with a clear focus on sustainable tourism and industry collaboration. Technically, the website is built on the Squarespace platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and reCAPTCHA for security and analytics. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices, features good SEO practices, and provides a user-friendly experience with clear navigation and professional design. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements basic security measures such as reCAPTCHA and cookie consent mechanisms. However, it lacks advanced security headers and does not publish a security policy or vulnerability disclosure, which are areas for improvement. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, but the website's professional presentation and valid contact information support its legitimacy. Overall, PATA's website demonstrates a strong digital presence with good content quality and business credibility. Strategic enhancements in security headers and transparency around incident response would further strengthen its security posture and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pata.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PATA operates in the hospitality and tourism sector as a membership-based non-profit organization. Its business model revolves around providing value to members through events, research, and capacity building initiatives. The organization targets a diverse audience including industry professionals, government bodies, and youth. The website reflects a mature digital ecosystem with integrated analytics and marketing tools. Partnerships with specialized platforms for membership management and research analytics indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The absence of public financial or certification disclosures suggests a focus on member services rather than commercial transactions. Growth indicators include upcoming events and active social media engagement, positioning PATA as a key influencer in Asia Pacific tourism development.

Security posture

The website maintains a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. Cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements, indicating privacy awareness. However, the absence of critical security headers such as HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, and X-Frame-Options exposes the site to potential risks like clickjacking and downgrade attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) header to enforce HTTPS and prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  2. Add Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header to mitigate cross-site scripting and data injection attacks.
  3. Include X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options headers to protect against clickjacking and MIME sniffing.
  4. Publish a security.txt file and a clear incident response policy to enhance transparency and facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and dependencies to minimize security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Pacific Asia Travel Association
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pacific Asia Travel Association
Description
A non-profit association promoting responsible travel and tourism in the Asia Pacific region, providing research, events, membership benefits, and capacity building.
Key services
Membership services, Events and conferences, Research and data analytics, Capacity building programs, Youth and student engagement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, Typekit Fonts, ShareThis
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
ShareThis
Marketing tools
ShareThis
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, indicating privacy protection or query failure.
  3. Site uses Squarespace CMS with modern web technologies and analytics.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented with official emails and phone numbers.
  8. Social media presence is active across multiple platforms.
  9. Website content is professional, relevant, and well-structured.
  10. Security headers are minimal; improvements recommended.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Squarespace, a reputable platform providing managed hosting and CMS capabilities. It uses modern web fonts via Typekit and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for data collection and marketing insights. The site loads asynchronously loaded scripts for performance optimization and includes a cookie consent banner for compliance. The design is responsive and accessible, with structured data markup enhancing SEO. Performance is moderate, typical for CMS-based sites with multiple external dependencies. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation is lacking. Opportunities exist to enhance security and performance through header optimization and potential script consolidation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pata.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pata.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.