Skip to main content

Security report for pasts.lv

Latvijas Pasts · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Latvijas Pasts is the national postal service provider of Latvia, offering a comprehensive range of postal and logistics services including parcel and letter sending and receiving, customs clearance, and business client solutions. The company maintains a strong market position as the largest postal network operator in Latvia, supported by digital platforms such as mans.pasts.lv for shipment management. The website reflects a mature digital infrastructure with modern technologies, good mobile optimization, and clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and consent management, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and GDPR adherence. Overall, the website projects high professionalism and trustworthiness, supporting the company's essential role in transportation and logistics within Latvia.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of pasts.lv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pasts.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
74
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Latvijas Pasts operates as a large essential entity in the transportation sector, targeting general consumers and business clients. Its business model revolves around providing accessible postal services nationwide, enhanced by digital tools for shipment tracking and management. The company leverages partnerships and subsidiary platforms to extend service offerings. The website content and structure indicate a focus on customer convenience, digital transformation, and business client engagement. The presence of social media channels and marketing tools suggests active customer outreach and brand building. The company appears well-established with consistent branding and a clear mission and vision.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of a consent management platform aligns with privacy regulations. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and a public security or incident response policy indicates room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected in the HTML content or scripts. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, which could be enhanced to strengthen security culture and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Create and make accessible a security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear contact information for the Data Protection Officer or security team to enhance trust.
  5. Continue enhancing digital platforms for business clients and consumers to maintain competitive advantage.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Latvijas Pasts
Description
"Latvijas Pasts" sniedz kvalitatīvus un pieejamus pakalpojumus visā Latvijā, attīstot mūsdienīgus risinājumus un veidojot uzticamu, konkurētspējīgu uzņēmumu. Misija ir savienot Baltiju ar pasauli ar mūsdienīgiem pakalpojumiem un aizrautīgiem darbiniekiem. Vērtības ietver atvērtību, mērķtiecību un atbildību. Vīzija ir būt pirmā izvēle sūtījumiem.
Key services
parcel sending and receiving, letter sending and receiving, postal network access, customs clearance, business client services, digital shipment management via mans.pasts.lv
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Typekit fonts, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Usercentrics CMP, Tiny Slider (tns), SVG icons
Frameworks
StimulusJS (data-controller attributes), XCALLY Motion chat integration
Platforms
mans.pasts.lv (digital shipment platform), express.pasts.lv (business client platform)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of consent management platform (Usercentrics)
  • Secure forms with POST method
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management Platform
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple services
  2. Strong digital presence with integrated shipment tracking and business client portals
  3. Clear contact information and support channels
  4. Use of modern web technologies and consent management
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  6. Good compliance with GDPR and cookie regulations
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including JavaScript frameworks (StimulusJS), Typekit fonts, and third-party integrations like Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. The site is hosted with CSC Latvia and uses proxy services for chat functionality. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured navigation. The CMS appears custom or proprietary. There is no indication of technical debt or outdated libraries. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and incident response mechanisms to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100 +5Medium33 findingsView report
  2. 57/100 −3Medium36 findingsView report
  3. 60/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pasts.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pasts.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.