Skip to main content

Security report for pasts.lv

Latvijas Pasts · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Latvijas Pasts is the national postal service provider in Latvia, offering a wide range of postal and logistics services including parcel and letter sending and receiving, courier services, and financial services. The organization positions itself as a reliable and modern postal partner connecting the Baltic region with the world. The website reflects a mature digital presence with multilingual support, clear navigation, and integration with digital platforms such as mans.pasts.lv for shipment management. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks and consent management tools, hosted on Microsoft Azure DNS infrastructure, indicating a robust and scalable setup. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though there is room for improvement in publishing explicit security policies and incident response information. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR, serving a broad general audience without any adult or questionable content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pasts.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Latvijas Pasts holds a leading market position as the primary postal and logistics provider in Latvia. Its business model revolves around providing accessible postal services to both private individuals and businesses, supported by digital platforms for ease of use. The company targets a wide audience including private customers and business clients, offering tailored services such as business client accounts and e-commerce integrations. The presence of partner domains and digital services indicates a well-developed ecosystem. The website content and structure suggest a focus on transparency, customer support, and digital transformation, which are key competitive advantages in the postal sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of a consent management platform for cookie compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact details indicates gaps in transparency and readiness. Security headers were not explicitly detected in the provided data, suggesting potential for enhancement. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is good but can be improved by formalizing security policies and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance transparency by including terms of service and data retention policies accessible from the website.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Latvijas Pasts
Description
"Latvijas Pasts" sniedz kvalitatīvus un pieejamus pakalpojumus visā Latvijā, attīstot mūsdienīgus risinājumus un veidojot uzticamu, konkurētspējīgu uzņēmumu. Misija ir savienot Baltiju ar pasauli ar mūsdienīgiem pakalpojumiem un aizrautīgiem darbiniekiem. Vērtības ietver atvērtību, mērķtiecību un atbildību. Vīzija ir būt pirmā izvēle sūtījumiem.
Key services
parcel sending and receiving, letter sending and receiving, courier services, financial services, postal network access, business client services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Typekit fonts, Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics CMP
Frameworks
StimulusJS (data-controller attributes)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible sensitive data exposure
  • Consent management platform used

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Usercentrics CMP
Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Clear focus on postal and logistics services in Latvia.
  3. Multiple language support (Latvian and English).
  4. Strong presence of official contact information and social media.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and consent management.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response page.
  8. No explicit terms of service page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including StimulusJS for frontend interactivity, Adobe Typekit for fonts, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Hosting is supported by Microsoft Azure DNS infrastructure, indicating enterprise-grade reliability. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility features and SEO practices such as proper meta tags and language alternates. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and module preloading. The use of a consent management platform ensures compliance with privacy regulations. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require continuous security oversight.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 57/100Medium36 findingsView report
  2. 57/100 −3Medium36 findingsView report
  3. 60/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pasts.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pasts.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.