Skip to main content

Security report for pasch.es

pasch.es · Energy · Spain

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pasch.es is a Spanish company specializing in supplying industrial equipment and solutions across sectors such as naval, energy, railway, and process industries. Their website showcases a broad product catalog including marine engines, turbines, compressors, and related equipment, targeting industrial clients and businesses. The company maintains a professional online presence with comprehensive company policies and structured navigation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using popular plugins like Elementor, Slider Revolution, and Contact Form 7, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though some accessibility and SEO enhancements could be made. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, but lacks visible security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are areas for improvement. The security posture is solid but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers and explicit privacy compliance features. The absence of WHOIS data due to Red.es restrictions limits domain trust analysis, but the website content and structure suggest a legitimate and established business. Overall, the site scores well in business credibility and technical implementation but should address privacy and security best practices to improve compliance and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pasch.es

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pasch.es operates as a B2B supplier in multiple industrial sectors, leveraging a diversified product portfolio that includes naval engines, energy turbines, railway components, and process equipment. The company targets industrial clients requiring specialized machinery and solutions. Their market position appears stable with a medium-sized footprint in Spain, supported by detailed product catalogs and corporate policies. The business model focuses on distribution and technical support, with no direct e-commerce observed. The website's structured navigation and sector-specific pages indicate a strategic approach to customer segmentation and product marketing. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam and abuse on contact forms. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. The lack of a published security.txt or explicit incident response contacts suggests limited formal vulnerability disclosure and incident management readiness. GDPR compliance is indicated by the presence of a privacy policy, but the missing cookie consent banner is a compliance gap. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, with room for improvement in transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner to comply with EU GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security transparency.
  4. Provide explicit incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) on the website.
  5. Regularly audit and update plugins and themes to mitigate risks from outdated or vulnerable components.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
pasch.es
Description
Pasch.es is a company operating in sectors including naval, energy, railway, and process industries, offering products such as marine engines, turbines, compressors, and various industrial equipment. The website presents detailed catalogs and company policies.
Key services
Marine engines and equipment, Energy turbines and modules, Railway infrastructure and rolling stock components, Industrial compressors and process equipment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Slider Revolution, Elementor, Contact Form 7, Bootstrap, Select2
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is not publicly accessible due to Red.es restrictions.
  3. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with popular plugins and themes.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage or main navigation.
  5. Privacy policy and terms of service are present and comprehensive.
  6. No explicit cookie consent banner detected despite EU GDPR relevance.
  7. Security headers are not visibly set; SSL is properly configured.
  8. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  9. Website content is in Spanish and targets industrial sectors.
  10. No suspicious external domains or links detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Slider Revolution for rich media content. It uses jQuery and Bootstrap for frontend interactivity and layout. Contact Form 7 is used for form handling with Google reCAPTCHA v3 integration for spam protection. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and Google reCAPTCHA domains. Performance is moderate, with some lazy loading and deferred scripts improving load times. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical stack is modern and widely supported but could benefit from additional security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pasch.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pasch.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.