Skip to main content

Security report for parshipmeet.com

ParshipMeet Group · Media · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ParshipMeet Group is a leading international dating and video communication company operating nine brands with over 500 employees and revenues exceeding 375 million Euros. The company supports individuals worldwide in finding meaningful connections through its apps available in over 190 countries and 25 languages. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, hosted behind Cloudflare, and uses modern web technologies including Usercentrics for consent management and Adobe Typekit for fonts. However, the SSL certificate is currently invalid, which poses a significant security risk. The company has implemented strong email authentication policies including SPF and DMARC with a reject policy, enhancing email security. Overall, the website demonstrates good content quality and branding consistency but requires urgent improvements in SSL configuration and security headers to ensure user trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching parshipmeet.com

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ParshipMeet Group holds a strong market position as one of the top three international dating and video companies. Its business model focuses on app-based dating and video communication services targeting a global audience. The company generates revenue through its nine brands and extensive advertising impressions. Its presence in over 190 countries and support for 25 languages indicate a broad and diverse customer base. The company leverages partnerships with payment processors like Stripe. The website content and structure reflect a mature organization with clear compliance and privacy policies, although direct contact information is limited on the homepage.

Security posture

The security posture of the website shows a mixed maturity level. While email security is robust with valid SPF and a strict DMARC reject policy, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of modern TLS protocols significantly undermine transport security. The site does not implement HSTS or OCSP stapling, and session resumption is disabled, which are best practices for HTTPS security. No explicit security or incident response policies are published on the site, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The use of a consent management platform indicates attention to privacy compliance. Overall, the site needs to address critical SSL/TLS issues to improve user trust and security compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately renew or install a valid SSL certificate to enable secure HTTPS connections.
  2. Enable and enforce modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated versions.
  3. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website.
  5. Maintain and monitor email authentication records and consider adding BIMI for brand trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a custom theme and hosted behind Cloudflare, providing DNS and CDN services. It uses Adobe Typekit for fonts and Usercentrics for cookie consent management. The DNS configuration is solid with no subdomain takeover risks and valid SPF and DMARC records. However, the SSL configuration is currently invalid, and no TLS protocols are enabled, which is a critical technical debt. Performance is slow with a page load time over 10 seconds and a page size of approximately 259 KB. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO, with good use of hreflang tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Technical modernization should focus on SSL/TLS improvements and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with parshipmeet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review parshipmeet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.