Skip to main content

Security report for parrishhealthcare.com

Parrish Healthcare · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Parrish Healthcare operates as a comprehensive healthcare provider network serving Brevard County, Florida. The organization offers a wide range of medical services including primary care, specialty services, emergency care, and community health programs. It holds multiple accreditations and certifications, positioning itself as a trusted healthcare leader in the region. The website reflects a professional and patient-focused approach with extensive resources, patient testimonials, and community engagement initiatives. Technically, the website is built on a modern CMS platform (Scorpion CMS) and employs standard web technologies such as JavaScript, jQuery, and integrates with Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized and includes accessibility features, enhancing user experience across devices and for users with disabilities. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, indicating attention to privacy compliance. However, the absence of visible security headers and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts suggest areas for improvement. The WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual for a healthcare entity but the website content and branding strongly indicate legitimacy. Overall, Parrish Healthcare's digital presence is robust and professional, supporting its business goals effectively. Strategic enhancements in security transparency and WHOIS registration clarity would further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching parrishhealthcare.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Parrish Healthcare is positioned as a large healthcare provider network with a strong foothold in Brevard County, FL. Its business model revolves around integrated healthcare delivery through hospitals, medical groups, and community partnerships. The organization leverages accreditations and patient testimonials as trust signals to attract and retain patients. The presence of a dedicated careers subdomain and foundation site indicates organizational maturity and community involvement. Marketing efforts utilize modern analytics and retargeting tools, supporting growth and patient engagement. The company targets local residents seeking comprehensive healthcare services, emphasizing quality and safety. The missing WHOIS data is a minor anomaly but does not detract significantly from the overall business credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, aligning with privacy regulations such as GDPR. The lack of visible security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness perception. No signs of malware or phishing were found. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a healthcare website but could be improved by adopting additional HTTP security headers and publishing formal security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to ensure domain registration information is complete and publicly available, enhancing trust.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability scans to proactively identify and remediate potential risks.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance disclosures by detailing data retention policies and user rights related to collected analytics and tracking data.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Parrish Healthcare
Description
Parrish Healthcare is a collaborative network of hospitals, providers, insurers, and allied health, social, and community-based service partners delivering safe, high-quality care to the Brevard County community.
Key services
Primary Care, Cardiovascular, Diabetes, Diagnostic Imaging, Endocrinology, Emergency Services, Health & Wellness, Home Health, Internal Medicine, Lab Services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, CookieYes, Scorpion CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Scorpion Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Brandcdn
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Buzzfighter, Brandcdn
Marketing tools
Scorpion Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple interactive elements.
  2. Strong presence of healthcare-related services and community engagement.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Multiple social media channels linked and active.
  5. No signs of adult or inappropriate content.
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual but not necessarily malicious.
  7. Use of modern tracking and marketing technologies.
  8. Good accessibility features including accessibility menu and ARIA roles.
  9. No visible security headers detected in HTML source; recommend further server header analysis.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Scorpion CMS, utilizing JavaScript and jQuery libraries, with integration of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site loads multiple asynchronous scripts for performance optimization and includes a cookie consent banner powered by CookieYes. The design is responsive and includes accessibility features such as ARIA roles and an accessibility menu. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of styles and scripts. The site uses modern SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter Cards. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and possibly optimize script loading further for enhanced performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with parrishhealthcare.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review parrishhealthcare.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.