Skip to main content

Security report for parquesreunidos.com

Grupo Parques Reunidos · Hospitality · Spain

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Grupo Parques Reunidos operates as a major global leisure park operator managing a diverse portfolio of amusement parks, aquariums, zoos, and water parks across multiple countries. The company employs various business models including ownership, management, and consultancy, positioning itself as a leader in the hospitality and entertainment sector. The website reflects a professional digital presence with clear navigation, multilingual support, and active social media engagement. Technically, the site is built on Adobe Experience Manager with integration of Google Tag Manager and OneTrust for cookie consent, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy policies, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable anomaly that reduces trust slightly, though the overall business credibility remains high based on website professionalism and content quality. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing comprehensive privacy and terms policies, and clarifying domain registration details to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching parquesreunidos.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as one of the largest operators in the leisure park industry, with a broad portfolio spanning amusement parks, aquariums, zoos, and water parks. Its business model is diversified across ownership, management, and advisory services, enabling flexibility and growth. The target audience is broad, encompassing families and leisure consumers globally. The website content and structure support brand consistency and trust, with active social media channels reinforcing market presence. However, the lack of visible company contact details and WHOIS transparency may impact stakeholder confidence. The company appears to prioritize sustainability and corporate responsibility, as indicated by dedicated website sections. Overall, the business intelligence suggests a mature enterprise with opportunities to enhance transparency and digital trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, demonstrating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of a published incident response contact or vulnerability disclosure policy limits the organization's readiness to handle security incidents transparently. The missing WHOIS registration data is a concern for domain legitimacy and trust. To improve security maturity, the organization should implement recommended security headers, publish clear privacy and security policies, and provide explicit incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents, including a dedicated security or abuse email address.
  4. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to enhance trust.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Grupo Parques Reunidos
Description
Parques Reunidos is one of the largest and fastest-growing leisure park operators worldwide, managing 61 parks in 14 countries. The group operates amusement parks, aquariums, zoos, and water parks under various business models including ownership, management, and consultancy.
Key services
Amusement parks operation, Aquariums management, Zoos management, Water parks operation, Consulting and advisory services for park developers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Helix RUM, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and warrants caution.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented, indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  5. Social media links are present and point to official company profiles.
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; recommend adding for improved security posture.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS platform, indicating a high level of technical infrastructure. It uses modern web technologies including asynchronous JavaScript loading, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and OneTrust for cookie compliance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices such as meta descriptions and canonical links. Performance appears moderate with deferred script loading and lazy image loading. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. Opportunities exist to improve technical security configurations and enhance privacy compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with parquesreunidos.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review parquesreunidos.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.