Skip to main content

Security report for parkinn.com

Radisson Hotel Group · Hospitality · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Radisson Hotel Group operates a global hospitality business with multiple hotel brands including Park Inn by Radisson. The website analyzed is currently blocked by a security mechanism, likely a Web Application Firewall (WAF), which restricts access due to automated detection. This limits the ability to fully assess the website's content and security posture. The site uses modern technologies such as Akamai CDN, Google Tag Manager, and OneTrust for cookie consent management, indicating a mature technical infrastructure. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, reflecting good privacy practices. However, the absence of WHOIS data and contact emails reduces the ability to verify domain legitimacy and business credibility fully. The site provides regional phone numbers for support but lacks visible forms or incident response contacts on the blocked page.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching parkinn.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Radisson Hotel Group is positioned as a global hospitality brand targeting travelers seeking hotel accommodations. Their business model focuses on hotel brand management and direct online bookings, supported by a mobile app. The website branding is consistent and professional, though the current blocked state impacts user experience. The company leverages tracking and marketing tools to optimize user engagement and analytics. The lack of visible detailed business information or certifications on the blocked page limits deeper business intelligence insights. The presence of regional support phone numbers indicates a structured customer service approach.

Security posture

The website employs Akamai CDN and security services, which likely provide robust protection against attacks. The presence of a WAF or similar security mechanism is confirmed by the access restriction page, which blocks suspicious or automated traffic. Cookie consent management via OneTrust demonstrates compliance with privacy regulations. However, the lack of visible security headers and the inability to access the full site content limit the assessment of security best practices. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is found. The security score is moderate due to these limitations, and recommendations include enhancing visible security headers and providing clearer user guidance when access is blocked.

Recommendations

  1. Improve transparency and user guidance on access restriction pages to reduce user frustration.
  2. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies accessible from the main website.
  3. Enhance security headers and ensure HTTPS enforcement across all pages.
  4. Provide verified company contact emails on the website to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Work with domain registrar to ensure WHOIS data is available or properly configured to support legitimacy verification.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Page content indicates access is restricted due to security reasons, likely triggered by automated detection or WAF. The page shows instructions to clear cookies, disable VPN, and update browser. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
Radisson Hotel Group
Description
Radisson Hotel Group operates a global hospitality business with multiple hotel brands including Park Inn by Radisson, offering hotel accommodations and related services.
Key services
Hotel accommodations, Online booking, Mobile app booking
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Akamai, OneTrust Consent Management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Akamai for CDN and security
  • Cookie consent management via OneTrust

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Tealium
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Consent Management, Tealium (utag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by a security mechanism (WAF or similar)
  2. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust analysis
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and comprehensive
  4. No contact emails found, only phone numbers for regional support
  5. No visible forms or data collection fields on the blocked page
  6. Use of modern tracking and consent management technologies
  7. Page is mobile responsive but content is minimal due to blocking
  8. No social media links detected in the provided HTML
  9. No security headers visible in the HTML content
  10. No explicit security or incident response policies found on this page
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Akamai CDN, and OneTrust for consent management. The site is mobile responsive but currently displays a minimal content page due to security blocking. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDN. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic, likely impacted by the blocked content state. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified beyond Akamai inferred from error strings. Technical debt or modernization opportunities cannot be fully assessed due to limited content access.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with parkinn.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review parkinn.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.