Skip to main content

Security report for park28.lv

park28.lv · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Park28.lv is a Latvian real estate website promoting the Park Residences project, a premium residential development in Jūrmala. The site targets home buyers and investors interested in purchasing apartments, offering detailed project information, galleries, and virtual tours. The business positions itself as a prestigious and sought-after real estate offering in the local market. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and WPBakery Page Builder, leveraging external resources like Google Fonts and Font Awesome. It uses HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a baseline of privacy compliance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but lacking advanced security headers and explicit incident response information. Analytics and marketing tools include Facebook Pixel and Yandex Metrika, reflecting moderate user tracking. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain trust verification, but the website content and structure suggest a legitimate small business. Overall, the site is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear contact channels, supporting a good user experience and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching park28.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
43
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as a digital presence for a small real estate development company focused on the Latvian market, specifically Jūrmala. Its competitive advantage lies in positioning as a premium residential project with a focus on quality and exclusivity. The business model revolves around direct apartment sales supported by digital marketing and virtual tours. The target customer segment includes local and regional buyers seeking high-end residential properties. The site integrates marketing and analytics tools to support lead generation and customer engagement. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies, indicating an independent operation. The company maintains a consistent brand image and provides essential contact information, enhancing trust. Growth indicators are not explicit but the presence of virtual tours and multimedia content suggests investment in digital marketing. Partnerships appear limited to service providers like 360tour.lv for virtual tours.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present, limiting transparency in security management. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces moderate tracking but no overt privacy violations were detected. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, which is a minor risk factor. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small real estate website but could benefit from enhanced headers, documented policies, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Add a dedicated security or incident response contact page to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights in the privacy policy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
park28.lv
Description
Park Residences is a prestigious real estate project in Jūrmala, Latvia, offering apartments for sale with or without renovation.
Key services
Apartment sales, Virtual tours, Project information and gallery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Fonts, Font Awesome, Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based real estate project site in Latvian language.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear navigation and contact options.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with consent mechanisms.
  4. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
  5. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  6. Tracking includes Facebook Pixel and Yandex Metrika for analytics and marketing.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. No terms of service or explicit security policies found.
  9. Contact phone number is clearly displayed in header and callback widget.
  10. Site uses multiple external resources from trusted domains.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.4.16 using WPBakery Page Builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a mature CMS environment with SEO optimization. It uses Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for client-side scripting. External resources include Google Fonts and Font Awesome for styling and icons. The site loads multiple JavaScript libraries asynchronously, improving performance. Cookie consent is managed by a dedicated plugin with a visible banner. Analytics are implemented via Yandex Metrika and Facebook Pixel, integrated through JavaScript. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive CSS and viewport meta tags. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Performance is moderate based on resource loading and script usage. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA landmarks and skip links present. SEO is good with canonical tags, meta robots, and structured data in JSON-LD format describing the website and webpage.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with park28.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review park28.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.