Skip to main content

Security report for parfum24.lv

Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Parfum24.lv is an e-commerce retailer specializing in perfumes, cosmetics, and related beauty products targeting Latvian and Russian-speaking consumers. The website offers a wide range of branded products with significant discounts and emphasizes original products sourced from official suppliers. The platform supports user login, subscription, and social media integration, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Technically, the site uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and tracking tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, and Yandex Metrika, reflecting standard marketing and analytics practices. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS but lacks visible advanced security headers and comprehensive privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, but the presence of clear contact information and professional content supports moderate trust. Overall, the site is functional and professionally presented but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching parfum24.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Parfum24.lv operates as a medium-sized online retailer in the beauty and cosmetics sector, focusing on branded perfumes and cosmetics with a discount-driven business model. The site targets consumers in Latvia and Russian-speaking markets, offering a broad brand portfolio and product categories including men’s and women’s fragrances, cosmetics for face, body, and hair, and gift sets. The business leverages digital marketing tools and social media integration to engage customers. However, the lack of visible privacy and cookie policies may expose the company to compliance risks under GDPR. The absence of WHOIS data restricts full verification of domain ownership and registration consistency, which is important for assessing business credibility. The company appears to maintain direct contact channels and claims official supplier relationships, which are positive indicators for customer trust and operational legitimacy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and cross-site scripting. The login form uses placeholder text but lacks visible advanced input validation or anti-CSRF tokens in the provided HTML snippet, which could be a potential risk. No evidence of incident response or security policy documentation was found, indicating limited transparency in security governance. The use of third-party tracking and marketing scripts introduces additional privacy considerations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in headers, form security, and privacy compliance to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against web attacks.
  3. Enhance form security by adding input validation, anti-CSRF tokens, and secure handling of user credentials.
  4. Obtain and verify WHOIS domain registration data to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Increase transparency by publishing security policies and incident response procedures to build customer confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Online store offering perfumes, cosmetics, and related products for women and men with discounts up to 85%. Emphasis on original branded products and no additional markups.
Key services
Sale of perfumes for men and women, Cosmetics for face, body, and hair, Gift sets, Tester perfumes
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, Yandex Metrika, AJAX
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an e-commerce platform specializing in perfumes and cosmetics.
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian with Russian language support.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email and phone.
  4. No privacy or cookie policy pages explicitly found in the provided HTML.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  6. Uses common tracking and marketing scripts from Google and Facebook.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in the provided data.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  9. Website content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and jQuery UI for UI components and AJAX for asynchronous operations. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, and Yandex Metrika, indicating a focus on user behavior tracking and marketing optimization. The site appears to be custom-built or uses a proprietary CMS, as no common CMS signatures were detected. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading but could be improved with modern frameworks and optimization techniques. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. SEO is supported by meta tags but could be enhanced with structured data and better semantic markup. Technical debt is implied by legacy libraries and lack of modern security headers, suggesting opportunities for modernization and improved security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with parfum24.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review parfum24.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.